These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33463588)

  • 41. Development and Test-Item Analysis of a Freely Available 1900-Item Question Bank for Rheumatology Trainees.
    Kumar B; Suneja M; Swee ML
    Cureus; 2021 Sep; 13(9):e18382. PubMed ID: 34646714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Construction and Writing Flaws of the Multiple-Choice Questions in the Published Test Banks of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Adoption, Caution, or Mitigation?
    Balaha MH; El-Ibiary MT; El-Dorf AA; El-Shewaikh SL; Balaha HM
    Avicenna J Med; 2022 Jul; 12(3):138-147. PubMed ID: 36092385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Quantitative analysis of single best answer multiple choice questions in pharmaceutics.
    Al Muhaissen SA; Ratka A; Akour A; AlKhatib HS
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Mar; 11(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 30904146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparison of the psychometric properties of three- and four-option multiple-choice questions in nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2010 Aug; 30(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 20053488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Multiple choice questions: a literature review on the optimal number of options.
    Vyas R; Supe A
    Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 19004145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Stepping up of MCQs' quality through a multi-stage reviewing process.
    Khafagy G; Ahmed M; Saad N
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Jul; 27(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 27315633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Ware J
    Med Educ; 2008 Feb; 42(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 18230093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Multiple-Choice Questions for Pharmacy Assessment.
    Leslie T; Gierl MJ
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2023 Oct; 87(10):100081. PubMed ID: 37852684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison in the quality of distractors in three and four options type of multiple choice questions.
    Rahma NAA; Shamad MMA; Idris MEA; Elfaki OA; Elfakey WEM; Salih KMA
    Adv Med Educ Pract; 2017; 8():287-291. PubMed ID: 28442942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.
    Dellinges MA; Curtis DA
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Aug; 81(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 28765439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: A randomized study.
    Vegada B; Shukla A; Khilnani A; Charan J; Desai C
    Indian J Pharmacol; 2016; 48(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 27721545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Relationship between item difficulty and discrimination indices in true/false-type multiple choice questions of a para-clinical multidisciplinary paper.
    Sim SM; Rasiah RI
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Feb; 35(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 16565756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting.
    Schneid SD; Armour C; Park YS; Yudkowsky R; Bordage G
    Med Educ; 2014 Oct; 48(10):1020-7. PubMed ID: 25200022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Construction of Multiple Choice Questions Before and After An Educational Intervention.
    Tenzin K; Dorji T; Tenzin T
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2017; 56(205):112-116. PubMed ID: 28598446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Impact of a longitudinal faculty development program on the quality of multiple-choice question item writing in medical education.
    Owolabi LF; Adamu B; Taura MG; Isa AI; Jibo AM; Abdul-Razek R; Alharthi MM; Alghamdi M
    Ann Afr Med; 2021; 20(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 33727512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
    Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The Effect of a One-Day Workshop on the Quality of Framing Multiple Choice Questions in Physiology in a Medical College in India.
    Dhanvijay AKD; Dhokane N; Balgote S; Kumari A; Juhi A; Mondal H; Gupta P
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e44049. PubMed ID: 37746478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Impact of item flaws, testing at low cognitive level, and low distractor functioning on multiple-choice question quality.
    Ali SH; Ruit KG
    Perspect Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 4(5):244-251. PubMed ID: 26350082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Knierim A; Hayes SK; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Dec; 26(8):662-71. PubMed ID: 17014932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluating the quality of multiple-choice questions in a NAPLEX preparation book.
    Danh T; Desiderio T; Herrmann V; Lyons HM; Patrick F; Wantuch GA; Dell KA
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2020 Oct; 12(10):1188-1193. PubMed ID: 32739055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.