These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33463850)
21. Higher Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Retail Prices After Excise Taxes in Oakland and San Francisco. Falbe J; Lee MM; Kaplan S; Rojas NA; Ortega Hinojosa AM; Madsen KA Am J Public Health; 2020 Jul; 110(7):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 32437271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of soda taxes beyond beverages in Philadelphia. Lozano-Rojas F; Carlin P Health Econ; 2022 Nov; 31(11):2381-2410. PubMed ID: 35978481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. How do consumers respond to "sin taxes"? New evidence from a tax on sugary drinks. Fichera E; Mora T; Lopez-Valcarcel BG; Roche D Soc Sci Med; 2021 Apr; 274():113799. PubMed ID: 33684702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Changes in Beverage Marketing at Stores Following the Oakland Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax. Zenk SN; Leider J; Pugach O; Pipito AA; Powell LM Am J Prev Med; 2020 May; 58(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 32192801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of a sweetened beverage tax on beverage prices in Seattle, WA. Jones-Smith JC; Pinero Walkinshaw L; Oddo VM; Knox M; Neuhouser ML; Hurvitz PM; Saelens BE; Chan N Econ Hum Biol; 2020 Dec; 39():100917. PubMed ID: 32801099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The caloric and sugar content of beverages purchased at different store-types changed after the sugary drinks taxation in Mexico. Pedraza LS; Popkin BM; Batis C; Adair L; Robinson WR; Guilkey DK; Taillie LS Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2019 Nov; 16(1):103. PubMed ID: 31718664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Philadelphia Beverage Tax and Association With Prices, Purchasing, and Individual-Level Substitution in a National Pharmacy Chain. Hua SV; Petimar J; Mitra N; Roberto CA; Kenney EL; Thorndike AN; Rimm EB; Volpp KG; Gibson LA JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323200. PubMed ID: 37440231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Targeted Beverage Taxes Influence Food and Beverage Purchases among Households with Preschool Children. Ford CN; Ng SW; Popkin BM J Nutr; 2015 Aug; 145(8):1835-43. PubMed ID: 26063069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Association of a Sweetened Beverage Tax With Soda Consumption in High School Students. Edmondson EK; Roberto CA; Gregory EF; Mitra N; Virudachalam S JAMA Pediatr; 2021 Dec; 175(12):1261-1268. PubMed ID: 34661612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pass-through of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax in food stores two years post-implementation: A difference-in-differences study. Leider J; Li Y; Powell LM PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244884. PubMed ID: 33395444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Decomposing consumer and producer effects on sugar from beverage purchases after a sugar-based tax on beverages in South Africa. Bercholz M; Ng SW; Stacey N; Swart EC Econ Hum Biol; 2022 Aug; 46():101136. PubMed ID: 35358759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sugar-Sweetened and Diet Beverage Consumption in Philadelphia One Year after the Beverage Tax. Zhong Y; Auchincloss AH; Lee BK; McKenna RM; Langellier BA Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32092982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In Mexico, Evidence Of Sustained Consumer Response Two Years After Implementing A Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax. Colchero MA; Rivera-Dommarco J; Popkin BM; Ng SW Health Aff (Millwood); 2017 Mar; 36(3):564-571. PubMed ID: 28228484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. Colchero MA; Popkin BM; Rivera JA; Ng SW BMJ; 2016 Jan; 352():h6704. PubMed ID: 26738745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Did high sugar-sweetened beverage purchasers respond differently to the excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Mexico? Ng SW; Rivera JA; Popkin BM; Colchero MA Public Health Nutr; 2019 Mar; 22(4):750-756. PubMed ID: 30560754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Impact of Seattle's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax on Substitution to Sweets and Salty Snacks. Oddo VM; Leider J; Powell LM J Nutr; 2021 Oct; 151(10):3232-3239. PubMed ID: 34159364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of Changes in Beverage Prices and Volume Sold Following the Implementation and Repeal of a Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois. Powell LM; Leider J JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Dec; 3(12):e2031083. PubMed ID: 33369659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Pricing Policies: Simulation of Minimum Price Laws and Taxes in New York City. Grummon AH; Golden SD Am J Prev Med; 2022 Mar; 62(3):e159-e168. PubMed ID: 34782187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Longer-term impacts of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on fast-food beverage prices: evidence from Oakland, California, 2-year post-tax. Marinello S; Pipito AA; Leider J; Pugach O; Powell LM Public Health Nutr; 2021 Aug; 24(11):3571-3575. PubMed ID: 33349292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of soda tax on beverage price, sale, purchase, and consumption in the US: a systematic review and meta-analysis of natural experiments. Shen J; Wang J; Yang F; An R Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1126569. PubMed ID: 37808982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]