These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33464213)
1. Physical Activity Monitoring Using a Fitbit Device in Ischemic Stroke Patients: Prospective Cohort Feasibility Study. Katzan I; Schuster A; Kinzy T JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e14494. PubMed ID: 33464213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Formative Evaluation of Consumer-Grade Activity Monitors Worn by Older Adults: Test-Retest Reliability and Criterion Validity of Step Counts. Maganja SA; Clarke DC; Lear SA; Mackey DC JMIR Form Res; 2020 Aug; 4(8):e16537. PubMed ID: 32651956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population. Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gallagher R Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 23(14):1476-85. PubMed ID: 26907794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site. Chow JJ; Thom JM; Wewege MA; Ward RE; Parmenter BJ Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():199-203. PubMed ID: 28666177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of Different Activity Monitors to Count Steps in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting. Treacy D; Hassett L; Schurr K; Chagpar S; Paul SS; Sherrington C Phys Ther; 2017 May; 97(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 28339904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Step count accuracy and reliability of two activity tracking devices in people after stroke. Schaffer SD; Holzapfel SD; Fulk G; Bosch PR Physiother Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 33(10):788-796. PubMed ID: 28777710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of 2 activity monitors in detecting steps in people with stroke and traumatic brain injury. Fulk GD; Combs SA; Danks KA; Nirider CD; Raja B; Reisman DS Phys Ther; 2014 Feb; 94(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 24052577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physical activity among children: objective measurements using Fitbit One Hamari L; Kullberg T; Ruohonen J; Heinonen OJ; Díaz-Rodríguez N; Lilius J; Pakarinen A; Myllymäki A; Leppänen V; Salanterä S BMC Res Notes; 2017 Apr; 10(1):161. PubMed ID: 28427441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults. Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consumer-based activity trackers in evaluation of physical activity in myositis patients. Saygin D; Rockette-Wagner B; Oddis C; Neiman N; Koontz D; Moghadam-Kia S; Aggarwal R Rheumatology (Oxford); 2022 Jul; 61(7):2951-2958. PubMed ID: 34528065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preliminary concurrent validity of the Fitbit-Zip and ActiGraph activity monitors for measuring steps in people with polymyalgia rheumatica. Chandrasekar A; Hensor EMA; Mackie SL; Backhouse MR; Harris E Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():339-345. PubMed ID: 29427859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Continuous daily assessment of multiple sclerosis disability using remote step count monitoring. Block VJ; Lizée A; Crabtree-Hartman E; Bevan CJ; Graves JS; Bove R; Green AJ; Nourbakhsh B; Tremblay M; Gourraud PA; Ng MY; Pletcher MJ; Olgin JE; Marcus GM; Allen DD; Cree BA; Gelfand JM J Neurol; 2017 Feb; 264(2):316-326. PubMed ID: 27896433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validating Fitbit Zip for monitoring physical activity of children in school: a cross-sectional study. Mooses K; Oja M; Reisberg S; Vilo J; Kull M BMC Public Health; 2018 Jul; 18(1):858. PubMed ID: 29996797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and Precision of Three Consumer-Grade Motion Sensors During Overground and Treadmill Walking in People With Parkinson Disease: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study. Lai B; Sasaki JE; Jeng B; Cederberg KL; Bamman MM; Motl RW JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Jan; 7(1):e14059. PubMed ID: 31944182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the Fitbit Charge 2 compared to the ActiGraph GT3X+ in older adults with knee osteoarthritis in free-living conditions. Collins JE; Yang HY; Trentadue TP; Gong Y; Losina E PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211231. PubMed ID: 30699159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of the Paul SS; Tiedemann A; Hassett LM; Ramsay E; Kirkham C; Chagpar S; Sherrington C BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2015; 1(1):e000013. PubMed ID: 27900119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site. Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity and Reliability of Fitbit Flex for Step Count, Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure. Sushames A; Edwards A; Thompson F; McDermott R; Gebel K PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161224. PubMed ID: 27589592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]