These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33465720)

  • 21. A survey of recycling behaviour in households in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
    Afroz R; Hanaki K; Tuddin R; Ayupp K
    Waste Manag Res; 2010 Jun; 28(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 19942645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing resident awareness on e-waste management in Bangalore, India: a preliminary case study.
    Awasthi AK; Li J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Apr; 25(11):11163-11172. PubMed ID: 29502260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An investigation of used electronics return flows: a data-driven approach to capture and predict consumers storage and utilization behavior.
    Sabbaghi M; Esmaeilian B; Raihanian Mashhadi A; Behdad S; Cade W
    Waste Manag; 2015 Feb; 36():305-15. PubMed ID: 25534039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The market of electrical and electronic equipment waste in Portugal: Analysis of take-back consumers' decisions.
    Botelho A; Ferreira Dias M; Ferreira C; Pinto LM
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Oct; 34(10):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 27449317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differences and determinants for polluted area, urban and rural residents' willingness to hand over and pay for waste mobile phone recycling: Evidence from China.
    Cai K; Wang L; Ke J; He X; Song Q; Hu J; Yang G; Li J
    Waste Manag; 2023 Feb; 157():290-300. PubMed ID: 36580884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Will the public pay for green products? Based on analysis of the influencing factors for Chinese's public willingness to pay a price premium for green products.
    Yang M; Chen H; Long R; Wang Y; Hou C; Liu B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Nov; 28(43):61408-61422. PubMed ID: 34173946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Waste battery disposal and recycling behavior: a study on the Australian perspective.
    Islam MT; Huda N; Baumber A; Hossain R; Sahajwalla V
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(39):58980-59001. PubMed ID: 35377120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Extended theory of planned behaviour for promoting construction waste recycling in Hong Kong.
    Mak TMW; Yu IKM; Wang L; Hsu SC; Tsang DCW; Li CN; Yeung TLY; Zhang R; Poon CS
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jan; 83():161-170. PubMed ID: 30514463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Waste mobile phones: A survey and analysis of the awareness, consumption and disposal behavior of consumers in Australia.
    Islam MT; Dias P; Huda N
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Dec; 275():111111. PubMed ID: 32829262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using a contingent valuation approach for improved solid waste management facility: evidence from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
    Afroz R; Masud MM
    Waste Manag; 2011 Apr; 31(4):800-8. PubMed ID: 21169007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Seafood consumers engagement in reducing environmental impacts from packaging.
    Almeida C; Laso J; de Sousa DB; Cooney R; Quinteiro P; Rowan N; Dias AC; Clifford E; Reboredo RG; Margallo M; Nunes ML; Marques A
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Mar; 863():160846. PubMed ID: 36526197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Financing electronic waste recycling Californian households' willingness to pay advanced recycling fees.
    Nixon H; Saphores JD
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):547-59. PubMed ID: 16979285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multi-stakeholder policy modeling for collection and recycling of spent portable battery waste.
    Gupta VK; Kaushal RK; Shukla SP
    Waste Manag Res; 2018 Jul; 36(7):577-593. PubMed ID: 29865967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. E-waste management and sustainability: a case study in Brazil.
    Azevedo LP; da Silva Araújo FG; Lagarinhos CAF; Tenório JAS; Espinosa DCR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(32):25221-25232. PubMed ID: 28929286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Co-evolutionary simulation study of multiple stakeholders in the take-out waste recycling industry chain.
    Long R; Yang J; Chen H; Li Q; Fang W; Wang L
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 231():701-713. PubMed ID: 30396143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Taiwanese Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Broiler Welfare Improvement.
    Yang YC; Hong CY
    Animals (Basel); 2019 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 31083431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Consumer survey on the final consumer behavior concerning the disposal of WEEE in Germany.
    Kummer S; Löhle S; Schmiedel U
    Waste Manag Res; 2022 May; 40(5):538-544. PubMed ID: 34121516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Consumer behaviour and environmental education in the field of waste electrical and electronic toys: a Spanish case study.
    Pérez-Belis V; Bovea MD; Simó A
    Waste Manag; 2015 Feb; 36():277-88. PubMed ID: 25488733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Designing and examining e-waste recycling process: methodology and case studies.
    Li J; He X; Zeng X
    Environ Technol; 2017 Mar; 38(6):652-660. PubMed ID: 27367434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Strategic exploration of battery waste management: A game-theoretic approach.
    Kaushal RK; Nema AK; Chaudhary J
    Waste Manag Res; 2015 Jul; 33(7):681-9. PubMed ID: 26060193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.