These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33468656)

  • 1. Results from a 2020 field experiment encouraging voting by mail.
    Hopkins DJ; Meredith M; Chainani A; Olin N; Tse T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jan; 118(4):. PubMed ID: 33468656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emergency Mail-in Voting in Rhode Island: Protecting Civic Participation During COVID-19 and Beyond.
    Burns NM; Zahiri K; Ganguli R; Kozel G; Paracha S; Tang KP; Tang OY; Wong KE
    R I Med J (2013); 2020 Oct; 103(8):14-17. PubMed ID: 33003675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study.
    Tang OY; Wong KE; Ganguli R; Zahiri K; Burns NM; Paracha S; Kozel G; Tang KP; Schuur JD
    West J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 22(4):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 35354012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. America's electorate is increasingly polarized along partisan lines about voting by mail during the COVID-19 crisis.
    Lockhart M; Hill SJ; Merolla J; Romero M; Kousser T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Oct; 117(40):24640-24642. PubMed ID: 32963092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should I vote-by-mail or in person? The impact of COVID-19 risk factors and partisanship on vote mode decisions in the 2020 presidential election.
    Atkeson LR; Hansen WL; Oliver MT; Maestas CD; Wiemer EC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274357. PubMed ID: 36107938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Universal vote-by-mail has no impact on partisan turnout or vote share.
    Thompson DM; Wu JA; Yoder J; Hall AB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(25):14052-14056. PubMed ID: 32518108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Convenient, but Prone to Error: Invisible Uncounted Mail Ballots].
    Nyhuis D
    Polit Vierteljahresschr; 2021; 62(4):597-619. PubMed ID: 34754130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating mail-based security for electoral processes using attack trees.
    Scala NM; Goethals PL; Dehlinger J; Mezgebe Y; Jilcha B; Bloomquist I
    Risk Anal; 2022 Oct; 42(10):2327-2343. PubMed ID: 35072977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emergency Patient Voting Initiative in a Community Hospital During a Global Pandemic:: Lessons and a Call-to-Action for Expanded Voter Access.
    Chamberlain C; Jaime H; Wohler D
    Dela J Public Health; 2021 Jan; 7(1):76-77. PubMed ID: 34467185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The voting experience and beliefs about ballot secrecy.
    Dowling CM; Doherty D; Hill SJ; Gerber AS; Huber GA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209765. PubMed ID: 30615669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. All-mail voting in Colorado increases turnout and reduces turnout inequality.
    Bonica A; Grumbach JM; Hill C; Jefferson H
    Elect Stud; 2021 Aug; 72():102363. PubMed ID: 36540291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The participatory and partisan impacts of mandatory vote-by-mail.
    Barber M; Holbein JB
    Sci Adv; 2020 Aug; 6(35):eabc7685. PubMed ID: 32923653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Who Votes by Mail?: A Dynamic Model of the Individual-Level Consequences of Voting-by-Mail Systems.
    Berinsky AJ
    Public Opin Q; 2001; 65(2):178-97. PubMed ID: 11420755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do you have a voting plan?: implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making.
    Nickerson DW; Rogers T
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 20424044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect on turnout of campaign mobilization messages addressing ballot secrecy concerns: A replication experiment.
    Gerber AS; Huber GA; Fang AH; Reardon CE
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182199. PubMed ID: 28793311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.
    Klimek P; Aykaç A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293239. PubMed ID: 37967045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forensic analysis of Turkish elections in 2017-2018.
    Klimek P; Jiménez R; Hidalgo M; Hinteregger A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204975. PubMed ID: 30289899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A 2 million-person, campaign-wide field experiment shows how digital advertising affects voter turnout.
    Aggarwal M; Allen J; Coppock A; Frankowski D; Messing S; Zhang K; Barnes J; Beasley A; Hantman H; Zheng S
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Mar; 7(3):332-341. PubMed ID: 36635584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of State Voting Processes in the 2020 Election: Estimating the Effects on Voter Turnout, Voting Method, and the Spread of COVID-19.
    Absher S; Kavanagh J
    Rand Health Q; 2023 Dec; 11(1):7. PubMed ID: 38264319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How did absentee voting affect the 2020 U.S. election?
    Yoder J; Handan-Nader C; Myers A; Nowacki T; Thompson DM; Wu JA; Yorgason C; Hall AB
    Sci Adv; 2021 Dec; 7(52):eabk1755. PubMed ID: 34936453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.