These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33469042)

  • 1. Classification and prediction of protein-protein interaction interface using machine learning algorithm.
    Das S; Chakrabarti S
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1761. PubMed ID: 33469042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicted binding site information improves model ranking in protein docking using experimental and computer-generated target structures.
    Maheshwari S; Brylinski M
    BMC Struct Biol; 2015 Nov; 15():23. PubMed ID: 26597230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple reference state makes a significant improvement in near-native selections from structurally refined docking decoys.
    Liang S; Liu S; Zhang C; Zhou Y
    Proteins; 2007 Nov; 69(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 17623864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binding interface prediction by combining protein-protein docking results.
    Hwang H; Vreven T; Weng Z
    Proteins; 2014 Jan; 82(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23836482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys.
    Hou Q; Lensink MF; Heringa J; Feenstra KA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155251. PubMed ID: 27166787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to choose templates for modeling of protein complexes: Insights from benchmarking template-based docking.
    Chakravarty D; McElfresh GW; Kundrotas PJ; Vakser IA
    Proteins; 2020 Aug; 88(8):1070-1081. PubMed ID: 31994759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy-based graph convolutional networks for scoring protein docking models.
    Cao Y; Shen Y
    Proteins; 2020 Aug; 88(8):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 32144844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature-based classification of native and non-native protein-protein interactions: Comparing supervised and semi-supervised learning approaches.
    Zhao N; Pang B; Shyu CR; Korkin D
    Proteomics; 2011 Nov; 11(22):4321-30. PubMed ID: 22002942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An SVM-based method for assessment of transcription factor-DNA complex models.
    Corona RI; Sudarshan S; Aluru S; Guo JT
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Dec; 19(Suppl 20):506. PubMed ID: 30577740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ProBiS-CHARMMing: Web Interface for Prediction and Optimization of Ligands in Protein Binding Sites.
    Konc J; Miller BT; Štular T; Lešnik S; Woodcock HL; Brooks BR; Janežič D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Nov; 55(11):2308-14. PubMed ID: 26509288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PPIcons: identification of protein-protein interaction sites in selected organisms.
    Sriwastava BK; Basu S; Maulik U; Plewczynski D
    J Mol Model; 2013 Sep; 19(9):4059-70. PubMed ID: 23729008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinguishing crystallographic from biological interfaces in protein complexes: role of intermolecular contacts and energetics for classification.
    Elez K; Bonvin AMJJ; Vangone A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 19(Suppl 15):438. PubMed ID: 30497368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Network properties of decoys and CASP predicted models: a comparison with native protein structures.
    Chatterjee S; Ghosh S; Vishveshwara S
    Mol Biosyst; 2013 Jul; 9(7):1774-88. PubMed ID: 23694935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blind predictions of protein interfaces by docking calculations in CAPRI.
    Lensink MF; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2010 Nov; 78(15):3085-95. PubMed ID: 20839234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of human and server prediction in CAPRI rounds 38-45.
    Duan R; Qiu L; Xu X; Ma Z; Merideth BR; Shyu CR; Zou X
    Proteins; 2020 Aug; 88(8):1110-1120. PubMed ID: 32483825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HawkDock: a web server to predict and analyze the protein-protein complex based on computational docking and MM/GBSA.
    Weng G; Wang E; Wang Z; Liu H; Zhu F; Li D; Hou T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jul; 47(W1):W322-W330. PubMed ID: 31106357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational prediction of protein-protein complexes.
    Mishra S
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 Sep; 5():495. PubMed ID: 22958278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MEGADOCK-Web: an integrated database of high-throughput structure-based protein-protein interaction predictions.
    Hayashi T; Matsuzaki Y; Yanagisawa K; Ohue M; Akiyama Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 May; 19(Suppl 4):62. PubMed ID: 29745830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites from weakly homologous template structures using meta-threading and machine learning.
    Maheshwari S; Brylinski M
    J Mol Recognit; 2015 Jan; 28(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 26268369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.