These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33469615)

  • 1. Retrospective studies - utility and caveats.
    Talari K; Goyal M
    J R Coll Physicians Edinb; 2020 Dec; 50(4):398-402. PubMed ID: 33469615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Secondary use of randomized controlled trials to evaluate drug safety: a review of methodological considerations.
    Hammad TA; Pinheiro SP; Neyarapally GA
    Clin Trials; 2011 Oct; 8(5):559-70. PubMed ID: 21878445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A guide to missing data for the pediatric nephrologist.
    Larkins NG; Craig JC; Teixeira-Pinto A
    Pediatr Nephrol; 2019 Feb; 34(2):223-231. PubMed ID: 29536258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias: a review of current understanding.
    Adebiyi AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2010 Sep; 39(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 21416795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring change in quality of life: bias in prospective and retrospective evaluation.
    Blome C; Augustin M
    Value Health; 2015 Jan; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 25595241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A framework for classifying study designs to evaluate health care interventions.
    Reeves BC
    Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd; 2004 Aug; 11 Suppl 1():13-7. PubMed ID: 15353897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the Clinical Implications of Planned Missing Data Designs.
    Huff SC; Anderson SR; Tambling RB
    J Marital Fam Ther; 2016 Apr; 42(2):313-25. PubMed ID: 26094709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the sexual consequences of surgery: retrospective and prospective strategies.
    Fichten CS; Libman E; Amsel R; Creti L; Weinstein N; Rothenberg P; Liederman G; Brender W
    J Behav Med; 1991 Jun; 14(3):267-85. PubMed ID: 1714962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study Design Considerations for Cancer Biomarker Discoveries.
    Zheng Y
    J Appl Lab Med; 2018 Sep; 3(2):282-289. PubMed ID: 30828695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From randomized trials to registry studies: translating data into clinical information.
    Brown ML; Gersh BJ; Holmes DR; Bailey KR; Sundt TM
    Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med; 2008 Oct; 5(10):613-20. PubMed ID: 18679381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reflection on modern methods: planned missing data designs for epidemiological research.
    Rioux C; Lewin A; Odejimi OA; Little TD
    Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 49(5):1702-1711. PubMed ID: 32356879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias: considerations for research practice.
    Gerhard T
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2008 Nov; 65(22):2159-68. PubMed ID: 18997149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pooling research results: benefits and limitations of meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP; Lau J
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1999 Sep; 25(9):462-9. PubMed ID: 10481815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The user experiences and clinical outcomes of an online personal health record to support self-management of bipolar disorder: A pretest-posttest pilot study.
    van den Heuvel SCGH; Meije D; Regeer EJ; Sinnema H; Riemersma RF; Kupka RW
    J Affect Disord; 2018 Oct; 238():261-268. PubMed ID: 29894931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic reviews incorporating evidence from nonrandomized study designs: reasons for caution when estimating health effects.
    Reeves BC; van Binsbergen J; van Weel C
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Aug; 59 Suppl 1():S155-61. PubMed ID: 16052184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hershey Medical Center Technical Workshop Report: optimizing the design and interpretation of epidemiologic studies for assessing neurodevelopmental effects from in utero chemical exposure.
    Amler RW; Barone S; Belger A; Berlin CM; Cox C; Frank H; Goodman M; Harry J; Hooper SR; Ladda R; LaKind JS; Lipkin PH; Lipsitt LP; Lorber MN; Myers G; Mason AM; Needham LL; Sonawane B; Wachs TD; Yager JW
    Neurotoxicology; 2006 Sep; 27(5):861-74. PubMed ID: 16889835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why all randomised controlled trials produce biased results.
    Krauss A
    Ann Med; 2018 Jun; 50(4):312-322. PubMed ID: 29616838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of cohort study design for cardiovascular nursing research.
    Hood MN
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 24(6):E1-9. PubMed ID: 19858946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective study designs in outcomes research: the case of migraine.
    Rothermich EA; Brod MI; Schonfeld WH; Rowland CR; Gomez-Mancilla B
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2002; 20(11):715-25. PubMed ID: 12201791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.