These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33469695)

  • 1. Barriers to safety and efficiency in robotic surgery docking.
    Cofran L; Cohen T; Alfred M; Kanji F; Choi E; Savage S; Anger J; Catchpole K
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jan; 36(1):206-215. PubMed ID: 33469695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Workflow disruptions in robot-assisted surgery.
    Wong SW; Crowe P
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):2663-2669. PubMed ID: 37815757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Room Size Influences Flow in Robotic-Assisted Surgery.
    Kanji F; Cohen T; Alfred M; Caron A; Lawton S; Savage S; Shouhed D; Anger JT; Catchpole K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety, efficiency and learning curves in robotic surgery: a human factors analysis.
    Catchpole K; Perkins C; Bresee C; Solnik MJ; Sherman B; Fritch J; Gross B; Jagannathan S; Hakami-Majd N; Avenido R; Anger JT
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3749-61. PubMed ID: 26675938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associations of flow disruptions with patient, staff, and process outcomes: a prospective observational study of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies.
    Koch A; Quartucci C; Buchner A; Schlenker B; Becker A; Catchpole K; Weigl M
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):6964-6974. PubMed ID: 37336845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnosing barriers to safety and efficiency in robotic surgery.
    Catchpole KR; Hallett E; Curtis S; Mirchi T; Souders CP; Anger JT
    Ergonomics; 2018 Jan; 61(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 28271956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying Workflow Disruptions in Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery: Elucidating Challenges Experienced by Surgical Teams.
    Zamudio J; Kanji FF; Lusk C; Shouhed D; Sanchez BR; Catchpole K; Anger JT; Cohen TN
    Obes Surg; 2023 Jul; 33(7):2083-2089. PubMed ID: 37147465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Associations of Intraoperative Flow Disruptions and Operating Room Teamwork During Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Weigl M; Weber J; Hallett E; Pfandler M; Schlenker B; Becker A; Catchpole K
    Urology; 2018 Apr; 114():105-113. PubMed ID: 29371162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Operating room team strategies to reduce flow disruptions in high-risk task episodes: resilience in robot-assisted surgery.
    Koch A; Schlenker B; Becker A; Weigl M
    Ergonomics; 2023 Aug; 66(8):1118-1131. PubMed ID: 36285451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical flow disruptions during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Dru CJ; Anger JT; Souders CP; Bresee C; Weigl M; Hallett E; Catchpole K
    Can J Urol; 2017 Jun; 24(3):8814-8821. PubMed ID: 28646936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minor flow disruptions, traffic-related factors and their effect on major flow disruptions in the operating room.
    Joseph A; Khoshkenar A; Taaffe KM; Catchpole K; Machry H; Bayramzadeh S;
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2019 Apr; 28(4):276-283. PubMed ID: 30158119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Work-system interventions in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review exploring the gap between challenges and solutions.
    Kanji F; Catchpole K; Choi E; Alfred M; Cohen K; Shouhed D; Anger J; Cohen T
    Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):1976-1989. PubMed ID: 33398585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flow disruptions in robotic-assisted abdominal sacrocolpopexy: does robotic surgery introduce unforeseen challenges for gynecologic surgeons?
    Souders CP; Catchpole K; Hannemann A; Lyon R; Eilber KS; Bresee C; Cohen T; Weigl M; Anger JT
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2177-2182. PubMed ID: 31041500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human Factors Integration in Robotic Surgery.
    Catchpole K; Cohen T; Alfred M; Lawton S; Kanji F; Shouhed D; Nemeth L; Anger J
    Hum Factors; 2024 Mar; 66(3):683-700. PubMed ID: 35253508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Barriers to efficiency in robotic surgery: the resident effect.
    Jain M; Fry BT; Hess LW; Anger JT; Gewertz BL; Catchpole K
    J Surg Res; 2016 Oct; 205(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 27664876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Flow Disruptions to Examine System Safety in Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Protocol for a Stepped Wedge Crossover Design.
    Alfred MC; Cohen TN; Cohen KA; Kanji FF; Choi E; Del Gaizo J; Nemeth LS; Alekseyenko AV; Shouhed D; Savage SJ; Anger JT; Catchpole K
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2021 Feb; 10(2):e25284. PubMed ID: 33560239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human factors in robotic assisted surgery: Lessons from studies 'in the Wild'.
    Catchpole K; Bisantz A; Hallbeck MS; Weigl M; Randell R; Kossack M; Anger JT
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jul; 78():270-276. PubMed ID: 29478667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impaired robotic surgical visualization: archaic issues in a modern operating room.
    Venkatayogi N; Parker M; Uecker J; Laviana AA; Cohen A; Belbina SH; Gereta S; Ancha N; Ravi S; Idelson C; Alambeigi F
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):2875-2880. PubMed ID: 37804395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting workflow in robot-assisted surgery: a scoping review.
    Poulsen JL; Bruun B; Oestergaard D; Spanager L
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):8713-8725. PubMed ID: 35739430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A sensor-based framework for layout and workflow assessment in operating rooms.
    Obuseh M; Cavuoto L; Stefanidis D; Yu D
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Oct; 112():104059. PubMed ID: 37311305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.