These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33469881)

  • 1. The visual and semantic features that predict object memory: Concept property norms for 1,000 object images.
    Hovhannisyan M; Clarke A; Geib BR; Cicchinelli R; Monge Z; Worth T; Szymanski A; Cabeza R; Davis SW
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):712-731. PubMed ID: 33469881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual and Semantic Representations at Encoding Contribute to True and False Recognition of Objects.
    Naspi L; Hoffman P; Devereux B; Morcom AM
    J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 41(40):8375-8389. PubMed ID: 34413205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deep Neural Networks and Visuo-Semantic Models Explain Complementary Components of Human Ventral-Stream Representational Dynamics.
    Jozwik KM; Kietzmann TC; Cichy RM; Kriegeskorte N; Mur M
    J Neurosci; 2023 Mar; 43(10):1731-1741. PubMed ID: 36759190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual and Semantic Representations Predict Subsequent Memory in Perceptual and Conceptual Memory Tests.
    Davis SW; Geib BR; Wing EA; Wang WC; Hovhannisyan M; Monge ZA; Cabeza R
    Cereb Cortex; 2021 Jan; 31(2):974-992. PubMed ID: 32935833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relative contributions of visual and semantic information in the neural representation of object categories.
    Victoria LW; Pyles JA; Tarr MJ
    Brain Behav; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e01373. PubMed ID: 31560175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantic influence on visual working memory of object identity and location.
    Hu R; Jacobs RA
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104891. PubMed ID: 34481197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Object activation in semantic memory from visual multimodal feature input.
    Kraut MA; Kremen S; Moo LR; Segal JB; Calhoun V; Hart J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Jan; 14(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 11798385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Common and differential electrophysiological mechanisms underlying semantic object memory retrieval probed by features presented in different stimulus types.
    Chiang HS; Eroh J; Spence JS; Motes MA; Maguire MJ; Krawczyk DC; Brier MR; Hart J; Kraut MA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Aug; 106():77-86. PubMed ID: 27329353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential effects of intrinsic properties of natural scenes and interference mechanisms on recognition processes in long-term visual memory.
    Mikhailova A; Lightfoot S; Santos-Victor J; Coco MI
    Cogn Process; 2024 Feb; 25(1):173-187. PubMed ID: 37831320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Declining object recognition performance in semantic dementia: A case for stored visual object representations.
    Tree JJ; Playfoot D
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2015; 32(7-8):412-26. PubMed ID: 27355607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multimodal feature binding in object memory retrieval using event-related potentials: Implications for models of semantic memory.
    Chiang HS; Spence JS; Eroh JT; Maguire MJ; Kraut MA; Hart J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jul; 153():116-126. PubMed ID: 32389620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual features as stepping stones toward semantics: Explaining object similarity in IT and perception with non-negative least squares.
    Jozwik KM; Kriegeskorte N; Mur M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Mar; 83():201-226. PubMed ID: 26493748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A neural network model of semantic memory linking feature-based object representation and words.
    Cuppini C; Magosso E; Ursino M
    Biosystems; 2009 Jun; 96(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 19758544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.
    Peleg O; Edelist L; Eviatar Z; Bergerbest D
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 26637339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. THINGSplus: New norms and metadata for the THINGS database of 1854 object concepts and 26,107 natural object images.
    Stoinski LM; Perkuhn J; Hebart MN
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1583-1603. PubMed ID: 37095326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. You shall know an object by the company it keeps: An investigation of semantic representations derived from object co-occurrence in visual scenes.
    Sadeghi Z; McClelland JL; Hoffman P
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Sep; 76():52-61. PubMed ID: 25196838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Representations of microgeometric tactile information during object recognition.
    Yasaka K; Mori T; Yamaguchi M; Kaba H
    Cogn Process; 2019 Feb; 20(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 30446884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reciprocal semantic predictions drive categorization of scene contexts and objects even when they are separate.
    Leroy A; Faure S; Spotorno S
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):8447. PubMed ID: 32439874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention can operate on object representations in visual sensory memory.
    Xie T; Nan W; Fu S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Nov; 83(8):3069-3085. PubMed ID: 34036534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eye-movements reveal semantic interference effects during the encoding of naturalistic scenes in long-term memory.
    Mikhailova A; Raposo A; Sala SD; Coco MI
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1601-1614. PubMed ID: 34009623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.