These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33470647)

  • 1. A survey to gauge confidence of Indian clinicians on three primary devices for blood pressure measurement.
    Kumar R; Sahani AK; Wander GS
    Blood Press Monit; 2021 Jun; 26(3):196-199. PubMed ID: 33470647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Araujo-Moura K; Souza LG; Mello GL; De Moraes ACF
    Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 181(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 34272985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park SH; Park YS
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):265-276. PubMed ID: 31658107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternatives to the mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Buchanan S; Orris P; Karliner J
    J Public Health Policy; 2011 Feb; 32(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 21109765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auscl-D: a mercury-free digital auscultatory sphygmomanometer.
    Kumar V; Kumar R; Kumar M; Wander GS; Sahani A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2021 Nov; 45(8):656-663. PubMed ID: 34254871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?
    Canzanello VJ; Jensen PL; Schwartz GL
    Arch Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 161(5):729-31. PubMed ID: 11231706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Which is More Accurate in Measuring the Blood Pressure? A Digital or an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer.
    Shahbabu B; Dasgupta A; Sarkar K; Sahoo SK
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Mar; 10(3):LC11-4. PubMed ID: 27134902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
    Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What will replace the mercury sphygmomanometer?
    Pickering TG
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Feb; 8(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 12604932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hidden errors of aneroid sphygmomanometers.
    Waugh JJ; Gupta M; Rushbrook J; Halligan A; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):309-12. PubMed ID: 12488650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of correlation between digital vs. mercury sphygmomanometer in a middle-income country: The role of socio-economic situation.
    Khosravi A; Behjati M; Mansouri A; Jozan M; Mohammadifard N; Taheri M; Khodarahmi S; Ansari R; Mansouri MH; Mansouri P; Sarrafzadegan N
    Clin Exp Hypertens; 2022 Feb; 44(2):113-118. PubMed ID: 34923883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oscillometric and auscultatory blood pressure measurement methods in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Duncombe SL; Voss C; Harris KC
    J Hypertens; 2017 Feb; 35(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 27870656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between blood pressure readings using a mercury versus an aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Farhan K; Naqvi STS; Rizvi SAH; Zafar A; Rawala MS
    Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb; 25(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 31764009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a clinical trial setting.
    Ma Y; Temprosa M; Fowler S; Prineas RJ; Montez MG; Brown-Friday J; Carrion-Petersen ML; Whittington T;
    Am J Hypertens; 2009 Mar; 22(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 19057514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From mercury sphygmomanometer to electric device on blood pressure measurement: correspondence of Minamata Convention on Mercury.
    Asayama K; Ohkubo T; Hoshide S; Kario K; Ohya Y; Rakugi H; Umemura S
    Hypertens Res; 2016 Apr; 39(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 26818650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of a project to calibrate mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure-measuring devices in Egypt.
    Ghareeb S; Youssef G; Ghareeb HS; El-Mageed HA; Mesalm MH; Talaat R; Eltawil A; Hasan DM; Ibrahim MM
    J Hum Hypertens; 2021 Oct; 35(10):921-926. PubMed ID: 33037321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Blood Pressure Values Obtained by Two Different Protocols: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2017-2018.
    Ostchega Y; Nwankwo T; Chiappa M; Wolz M; Graber J; Nguyen DT
    Vital Health Stat 1; 2021 Apr; (87):1-26. PubMed ID: 34125665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The mercury sphygmomanometer should be abandoned before it is proscribed.
    Markandu ND; Whitcher F; Arnold A; Carney C
    J Hum Hypertens; 2000 Jan; 14(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10673728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
    Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.