These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33470647)

  • 21. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of Missouri aneroid sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure in patients with cancer.
    Ferreira KA; Santos AC; Arthur TC; Santos DA; Pereira D; Freitas EO; Fukuda FM; Baia WR
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 95(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20658091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Consistency between the electronic and mercury sphygmomanometer in children and adolescents on blood pressure measuring].
    Cao Q; Li D; Yu W; Guo Q; Zhao L; Yu D; Wang Y
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2016 Sep; 45(5):758-765. PubMed ID: 29903127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
    Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical validation of aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Saxena Y; Saxena V; Gupta R
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23734440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
    Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of the pressure scale of sphygmomanometers in clinical use within primary care.
    Coleman AJ; Steel SD; Ashworth M; Vowler SL; Shennan A
    Blood Press Monit; 2005 Aug; 10(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 16077263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Replacing Mercury Sphygmomanometers With Mercury-Free Sphygmomanometers for the National Health Survey in Children: Direct Comparisons Applying Two Types of Mercury-Free Sphygmomanometer.
    Kim SH; Kim YM; Kim SH; Shin J; Lee EM
    Korean Circ J; 2024 May; 54(5):270-287. PubMed ID: 38767340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The case for a hybrid sphygmomanometer.
    Pickering T
    Blood Press Monit; 2001 Aug; 6(4):177-9. PubMed ID: 11805464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Concept, hardware development, and clinical trials of a Galinstan based Mercury free sphygmomanometer: Merkfree.
    Kumar R; Kumar M; Wander GS; Sahani AK
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15813. PubMed ID: 36138083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of sphygmomanometers at pharmacies.
    Erdem DG; Erdem E; Dilek M; Aydogdu T; Selim N; Demiray F; Sari A; Akpolat T
    Kidney Blood Press Res; 2009; 32(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 19622898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Type and accuracy of sphygmomanometers in primary care: a cross-sectional observational study.
    A'Court C; Stevens R; Sanders S; Ward A; McManus R; Heneghan C
    Br J Gen Pract; 2011 Sep; 61(590):e598-603. PubMed ID: 22152749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Agreement of blood pressure measurements between random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Yang W; Gu D; Chen J; Jaquish CE; Rao DC; Wu X; Hixson JE; Duan X; Kelly TN; Hamm LL; Whelton PK; He J;
    Am J Med Sci; 2008 Nov; 336(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 19011391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How accurate are sphygmomanometers?
    Mion D; Pierin AM
    J Hum Hypertens; 1998 Apr; 12(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 9607693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of aneroid sphygmomanometer blood pressure recording compared with digital and mercury measurements in Brazil.
    Gill G; Ala L; Gurgel R; Cuevas L
    Trop Doct; 2004 Jan; 34(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 14959969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of automated blood pressure measurements in the presence of atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Clark CE; McDonagh STJ; McManus RJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 2019 May; 33(5):352-364. PubMed ID: 30631126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measuring blood pressure using an automated sphygmomanometer.
    Wedgbury K; Valler-Jones T
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Jun12-25; 17(11):714-8. PubMed ID: 18773588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.