177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33471043)
21. The effect of surgery report cards on improving radical prostatectomy quality: the SuRep study protocol.
Breau RH; Kumar RM; Lavallee LT; Cagiannos I; Morash C; Horrigan M; Cnossen S; Mallick R; Stacey D; Fung-Kee-Fung M; Morash R; Smylie J; Witiuk K; Fergusson DA
BMC Urol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 30340572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Coelho RF; Chauhan S; Orvieto MA; Sivaraman A; Palmer KJ; Coughlin G; Patel VR
Eur Urol; 2011 Jan; 59(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 20801579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of open radical retropubic prostatectomy on continence and lower urinary tract symptoms: a prospective assessment using validated self-administered outcome instruments.
Lepor H; Kaci L
J Urol; 2004 Mar; 171(3):1216-9. PubMed ID: 14767305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Effect of Nerve Sparing Status on Sexual and Urinary Function: 3-Year Results from the CEASAR Study.
Avulova S; Zhao Z; Lee D; Huang LC; Koyama T; Hoffman KE; Conwill RM; Wu XC; Chen V; Cooperberg MR; Goodman M; Greenfield S; Hamilton AS; Hashibe M; Paddock LE; Stroup A; Resnick MJ; Penson DF; Barocas DA
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1202-1209. PubMed ID: 29253578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: can men at risk be identified preoperatively?
Moore KN; Truong V; Estey E; Voaklander DC
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(3):270-9; quiz 280-1. PubMed ID: 17505246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.
Suardi N; Moschini M; Gallina A; Gandaglia G; Abdollah F; Capitanio U; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Passoni N; Salonia A; Hedlund P; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 22726993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Prospective Study of Nearly 500 Patients.
Umari P; Eden C; Cahill D; Rizzo M; Eden D; Sooriakumaran P
J Urol; 2021 Mar; 205(3):780-790. PubMed ID: 33086025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Obesity does not adversely affect health-related quality-of-life outcomes after anatomic retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Freedland SJ; Haffner MC; Landis PK; Saigal CS; Carter HB
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1131-6. PubMed ID: 15913722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Are We Improving Erectile Function Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy? Analysis of Patients Treated over the Last Decade.
Capogrosso P; Vertosick EA; Benfante NE; Eastham JA; Scardino PJ; Vickers AJ; Mulhall JP
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):221-228. PubMed ID: 30237021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Assess the Utility of Tacrolimus (FK506) for the Prevention of Erectile Dysfunction Following Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy.
Mulhall JP; Klein EA; Slawin K; Henning AK; Scardino PT
J Sex Med; 2018 Sep; 15(9):1293-1299. PubMed ID: 30224019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Patient-reported outcomes after open radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Hashine K; Kakuda T; Iuchi S; Tomida R; Matsumura M
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2019 Dec; 49(11):1037-1042. PubMed ID: 31436793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective assessment of patient reported urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.
Wei JT; Dunn RL; Marcovich R; Montie JE; Sanda MG
J Urol; 2000 Sep; 164(3 Pt 1):744-8. PubMed ID: 10953138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessing the Quality of Surgical Care for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Results from the CEASAR Study.
Reisz PA; Laviana AA; Zhao Z; Huang LC; Koyama T; Conwill R; Hoffman K; Goodman M; Hamilton AS; Wu XC; Paddock LE; Stroup A; Cooperberg MR; Hashibe M; O'Neil BB; Kaplan SH; Greenfield S; Penson DF; Barocas DA
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1236-1241. PubMed ID: 32568605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Men with low preoperative sexual function may benefit from nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
Harris CR; Punnen S; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):981-6. PubMed ID: 23410984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Variation in patient reported outcomes following radical prostatectomy: A bi-national registry-based study.
O'Callaghan ME; Roberts MJ; Moretti KL; Frydenberg M; Gilbourd D; Mark S; Heathcote P; Millar J; Pcor-Anz ; Papa N
Urol Oncol; 2023 Feb; 41(2):105.e9-105.e18. PubMed ID: 36437157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prospective assessment of voiding and sexual function after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma: comparison of radical prostatectomy to hormonobrachytherapy with and without external beam radiotherapy.
Fulmer BR; Bissonette EA; Petroni GR; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2001 Jun; 91(11):2046-55. PubMed ID: 11391584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The failure of a nerve sparing template to improve urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: attention to study design.
Tzou DT; Dalkin BL; Christopher BA; Cui H
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 18439849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of incidence and risk factors and impact on urinary function.
Msezane LP; Reynolds WS; Gofrit ON; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Zorn KC
J Endourol; 2008 Feb; 22(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 18095861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Recovery of urinary function after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical perineal prostatectomy for early-stage prostate cancer.
Jafri SM; Nguyen LN; Sirls LT
Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Dec; 50(12):2187-2191. PubMed ID: 30328088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
