These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33471208)

  • 1. Influence of nanoparticulated chitosan on the biomodification of eroded dentin: clinical and photographic longitudinal analysis of restorations.
    de Souza JC; Tedesco AC; Takahashi LAU; Curylofo-Zotti FA; Souza-Gabriel AE; Corona SAM
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2021 Jan; 32(1):11. PubMed ID: 33471208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical performance of posterior restorations using a universal adhesive over moist and dry dentin: A 36-month double-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Ñaupari-Villasante R; Falconi-Páez C; Castro AS; Gutiérrez MF; Mendez-Bauer ML; Aliaga P; Dávila-Sánchez A; Arrais C; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    J Dent; 2024 Aug; 147():105080. PubMed ID: 38788919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-year clinical evaluation of composite restorations in posterior teeth: effect of adhesive systems.
    Sundfeld RH; Scatolin RS; Oliveira FG; Machado LS; Alexandre RS; Sundefeld ML
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):E1-8. PubMed ID: 22621163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis.
    Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Swift EJ; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 18666493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
    Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents.
    Matis BA; Cochran MJ; Carlson TJ; Guba C; Eckert GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Apr; 135(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 15127867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of etch-and-rinse adhesives on dry and rewet dentin under rubbing action: a 24-month clinical evaluation.
    Zander-Grande C; Ferreira SQ; da Costa TR; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jul; 142(7):828-35. PubMed ID: 21719806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 12-year clinical evaluation of a three-step dentin adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 May; 140(5):526-35. PubMed ID: 19411519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: a two-year clinical trial.
    Türkün LS; Celik EU
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 19058687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations.
    Lange RT; Pfeiffer P
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 19544814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez IV; Fuentes S; Reis A; Muñoz MA
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():60-69. PubMed ID: 28962842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 2-year Clinical evaluation of sodium hypochlorite treatment in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: a pilot study.
    Saboia Vde P; Almeida PC; Rittet AV; Swift EJ; Pimenta LA
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):530-5. PubMed ID: 17024939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive.
    Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 17432395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 13-year clinical evaluation of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious class-V lesions.
    Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt KL; Poitevin A; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 20931252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two-Year Clinical Study.
    Vural UK; Kiremitçi A; Gökalp S
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e204-e209. PubMed ID: 28960769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.