BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33472018)

  • 21. Para-aortic workup in locally advanced cervical cancer: heterogeneity is still the rule. Results from a retrospective multicenter study.
    Chantalat E; Vidal F; Leguevaque P; Lepage B; Lambaudie E; Hebert T; Motton S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 May; 293(5):1081-6. PubMed ID: 26385726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Oncologic outcomes in the era of modern radiation therapy using FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer.
    Brodeur MN; Dejean R; Beauchemin MC; Samouëlian V; Cormier B; Bacha OM; Warkus T; Barkati M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 34059350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Extended field chemoradiation for cervical cancer patients with histologically proven para-aortic lymph node metastases after laparaoscopic lymphadenectomy.
    Marnitz S; Schram J; Budach V; Sackerer I; Vercellino GF; Sehouli J; Köhler C
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2015 May; 191(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25413986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. False negative rate at
    Gouy S; Seebacher V; Chargari C; Terroir M; Grimaldi S; Ilenko A; Maulard A; Genestie C; Leary A; Pautier P; Morice P; Deandreis D
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):135. PubMed ID: 33549033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intensity modulated radiation therapy boost in locally-advanced cervical cancer in the absence of brachytherapy.
    Lazzari R; Riva G; Augugliaro M; Vavassori A; Dicuonzo S; Cattani F; Comi S; Colombo N; Jereczek-Fossa BA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):607-612. PubMed ID: 32188626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Pötter R; Georg P; Dimopoulos JC; Grimm M; Berger D; Nesvacil N; Georg D; Schmid MP; Reinthaller A; Sturdza A; Kirisits C
    Radiother Oncol; 2011 Jul; 100(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 21821305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of global treatment guidelines for locally advanced cervical cancer to optimize best care practices: A systematic and scoping review.
    Pujade-Lauraine E; Tan DSP; Leary A; Mirza MR; Enomoto T; Takyar J; Nunes AT; Chagüi JDH; Paskow MJ; Monk BJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Nov; 167(2):360-372. PubMed ID: 36096973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Outcome of international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IIb cervical cancer from 2003 to 2012: an evaluation of treatments and prognosis: a retrospective study.
    Guo L; Liu X; Wang L; Sun H; Huang K; Li X; Tang F; Li S; Yuan X; Wang C
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jun; 25(5):910-8. PubMed ID: 25867278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Chemobrachyradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer : A retrospective single institution study.
    Tomić K; Berić Jozić G; Parić A; Marijanović I; Lasić I; Soldo D; Vrdoljak E
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2021 Nov; 133(21-22):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 34674038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Neo-adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer (Lacc) patients: A phase II study.
    Ferrandina G; Palluzzi E; Gallotta V; Gambacorta MA; Autorino R; Turco LC; Macchia G; Cosentino F; Gui B; Mattoli MV; Ronzino G; Valentini V; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1062-1068. PubMed ID: 29753611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical efficacy of alternating chemoradiotherapy by conformal radiotherapy combined with intracavitary brachytherapy for high-risk cervical cancer.
    Hirata K; Kodaira T; Tomita N; Ohshima Y; Ito J; Tachibana H; Nakanishi T; Fuwa N
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jun; 44(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 24755546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cervical cancer with paraaortic involvement: do patients truly benefit from tailored chemoradiation therapy? A retrospective study on 8 French centers.
    Chantalat E; Vidal F; Leguevaque P; Lepage B; Mathevet P; Deslandres M; Motton S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():118-22. PubMed ID: 26295788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical outcomes following conventional external beam radiotherapy boost in Japanese patients with cervical cancer who are ineligible for intracavitary brachytherapy.
    Ito K; Shimizuguchi T; Karasawa K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2019 Mar; 49(3):270-275. PubMed ID: 30576504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
    Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Laparoscopic paraaortic surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: a single-center experience.
    Vázquez-Vicente D; Fernández Del Bas B; García Villayzán J; Di Fiore HA; Luna Tirado J; Casado Echarren V; García-Foncillas J; Plaza Arranz J; Chiva L
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1455-1459. PubMed ID: 29671223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Operable stage IB and II cancer of the uterine neck: retrospective comparison between preoperative utero-vaginal curietherapy and initial surgery followed by radiotherapy].
    Atlan D; Touboul E; Deniaud-Alexandre E; Lefranc JP; Ganansia V; Bernard A; Antoine JM; Jannet D; Lhuillier PE; Uzan M; Genestie C; Antoine M; Jamali M; Milliez J; Uzan S; Blondon J
    Cancer Radiother; 2002 Jun; 6(4):217-37. PubMed ID: 12224488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on outcomes and complications after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors (GOTIC Study).
    Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Satoh T; Takei Y; Takano M; Nagao S; Sekiguchi I; Suzuki M
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 14(1):173. PubMed ID: 27356862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Role of Surgical Versus Clinical Staging in Chemoradiated FIGO Stage IIB-IVA Cervical Cancer Patients-Acute Toxicity and Treatment Quality of the Uterus-11 Multicenter Phase III Intergroup Trial of the German Radiation Oncology Group and the Gynecologic Cancer Group.
    Marnitz S; Martus P; Köhler C; Stromberger C; Asse E; Mallmann P; Schmidberger H; Affonso Júnior RJ; Nunes JS; Sehouli J; Budach V
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Feb; 94(2):243-53. PubMed ID: 26853333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Glassy cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: 20-year experience from a comprehensive cancer center.
    Boustani J; Achkar S; Bertaut A; Genestie C; Gouy S; Pautier P; Morice P; Haie-Meder C; Chargari C
    Cancer Radiother; 2021 May; 25(3):207-212. PubMed ID: 33408051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effective treatment of stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma with high dose-rate vaginal apex radiation (192Ir) and chemotherapy.
    Turner BC; Knisely JP; Kacinski BM; Haffty BG; Gumbs AA; Roberts KB; Frank AH; Peschel RE; Rutherford TJ; Edraki B; Kohorn EI; Chambers SK; Schwartz PE; Wilson LD
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 9422561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.