336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33472549)
1. Comparison of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Treatment Plans Between 1.5T MR-Linac and Conventional Linac.
Ding S; Li Y; Liu H; Li R; Wang B; Zhang J; Chen Y; Huang X
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():1533033820985871. PubMed ID: 33472549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.
Da Silva Mendes V; Nierer L; Li M; Corradini S; Reiner M; Kamp F; Niyazi M; Kurz C; Landry G; Belka C
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 34289868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a simplified optimizer for MR-guided adaptive RT in case of pancreatic cancer.
Cusumano D; Boldrini L; Menna S; Teodoli S; Placidi E; Chiloiro G; Placidi L; Greco F; Stimato G; Cellini F; Valentini V; Azario L; De Spirito M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 20(9):20-30. PubMed ID: 31444952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of margin reduction on radiation dose distribution of ultra-hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy utilizing a 1.5-T MR-Linac.
Onal C; Efe E; Bozca R; Yavas C; Yavas G; Arslan G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 25(1):e14179. PubMed ID: 38013636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric feasibility of brain stereotactic radiosurgery with a 0.35 T MRI-guided linac and comparison vs a C-arm-mounted linac.
Slagowski JM; Redler G; Malin MJ; Cammin J; Lobb EC; Lee BH; Sethi A; Roeske JC; Flores-Martinez E; Stevens T; Yenice KM; Green O; Mutic S; Aydogan B
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5455-5466. PubMed ID: 32996591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of treatment plans for a high-field MRI-linac and a conventional linac for esophageal cancer.
Nachbar M; Mönnich D; Kalwa P; Zips D; Thorwarth D; Gani C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Apr; 195(4):327-334. PubMed ID: 30361744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric analysis of MR-LINAC treatment plans for salvage spine SBRT re-irradiation.
Han EY; Yeboa DN; Briere TM; Yang J; Wang H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 23(10):e13752. PubMed ID: 36004700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of field number and beam angle on ERE for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy with 1.5T MR-Linac.
Ding S; Liu H; Wang B; Li Y; Li R; Liu B; Xia Y; Huang X
Cancer Radiother; 2021 Jun; 25(4):366-372. PubMed ID: 33622638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI-based IMRT planning for MR-linac: comparison between CT- and MRI-based plans for pancreatic and prostate cancers.
Prior P; Chen X; Botros M; Paulson ES; Lawton C; Erickson B; Li XA
Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(10):3819-42. PubMed ID: 27089554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Serial tomotherapy vs. MLC-IMRT (multileaf collimator intensity modulated radiotherapy) for simultaneous boost treatment large intracerebral lesions].
Wolff D; Abo-Madyan Y; Dobler B; Lohr F; Mai S; Polednik M; Wenz F
Z Med Phys; 2009; 19(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 19459586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Real-time motion-including dose estimation of simulated multi-leaf collimator-tracked magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy.
Persson E; Goodwin E; Eiben B; Wetscherek A; Nill S; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2221-2229. PubMed ID: 37898109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. First system for fully-automated multi-criterial treatment planning for a high-magnetic field MR-Linac applied to rectal cancer.
Bijman R; Rossi L; Janssen T; de Ruiter P; Carbaat C; van Triest B; Breedveld S; Sonke JJ; Heijmen B
Acta Oncol; 2020 Aug; 59(8):926-932. PubMed ID: 32436450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric comparison of two treatment planning systems for spine SBRT.
Lee YK; Munawar I; Mashouf S; Sahgal A; Ruschin M
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31376988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric comparison of different multileaf collimator leaves in treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Wang S; Ai P; Xie L; Xu Q; Bai S; Lu Y; Li P; Chen N
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 24099965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A planning-based feasibility study of MR-Linac treatment for anal cancer radiation therapy.
Smith D; Knight K; Sim J; Lim Joon D; Foroudi F; Khoo V
Med Dosim; 2023 Winter; 48(4):267-272. PubMed ID: 37507334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A treatment planning study comparing Elekta VMAT and fixed field IMRT using the varian treatment planning system eclipse.
Peters S; Schiefer H; Plasswilm L
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9():153. PubMed ID: 25011529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR.
Choi CH; Kim JH; Kim JI; Park JM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0220039. PubMed ID: 31329641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric feasibility of the hybrid Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-linac System (MRL) for brain metastases: The impact of the magnetic field.
Tseng CL; Eppinga W; Seravalli E; Hackett S; Brand E; Ruschin M; Lee YK; Atenafu EG; Sahgal A
Radiother Oncol; 2017 Nov; 125(2):273-279. PubMed ID: 29079310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
