These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33473018)

  • 1. An overview on the veracity of intraoral digital scanning system and utilization of iTero scanner for analyzing orthodontic study models both
    Jabri MA; Wu S; Pan Y; Wang L
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Jan; 24(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 33473018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
    Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of Dental Monitoring 3D digital dental models using photograph and video mode.
    Morris RS; Hoye LN; Elnagar MH; Atsawasuwan P; Galang-Boquiren MT; Caplin J; Viana GC; Obrez A; Kusnoto B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):420-428. PubMed ID: 31474272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.
    Patzelt SB; Bishti S; Stampf S; Att W
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25359645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison.
    Keul C; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):735-745. PubMed ID: 31134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Digital Models Formulated From Direct Intra-oral Scanning of Dental Arches in Comparison With Extra-oral Scanning of Poured Dental Models in Terms of Dimensional Accuracy and Reliability.
    Jaber ST; Hajeer MY; Alkhouli KW; Al-Shamak RM; Darwich KMA; Aljabban O; Alam MK; Kara-Boulad JM
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54869. PubMed ID: 38405645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning.
    Tomita Y; Uechi J; Konno M; Sasamoto S; Iijima M; Mizoguchi I
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jul; 37(4):628-633. PubMed ID: 29669951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Full 3-dimensional digital workflow for multicomponent dental appliances: A proof of concept.
    van der Meer WJ; Vissink A; Ren Y
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Apr; 147(4):288-91. PubMed ID: 26857039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of Bolton's Analysis among Different Malocclusion Patients Plaster Models and Digital Models Obtained by
    Jabri MA; Wu S; Zhang Y; Wang H; Pan Y; Ma J; Wang L
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Jul; 24(7):1086-1091. PubMed ID: 34290188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction.
    Burzynski JA; Firestone AR; Beck FM; Fields HW; Deguchi T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):534-541. PubMed ID: 29602345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of intraoral scans in the mixed dentition: a prospective non-randomized comparative clinical trial.
    Liczmanski K; Stamm T; Sauerland C; Blanck-Lubarsch M
    Head Face Med; 2020 May; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 32430023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
    Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of accuracy of mesiodistal tooth measurements made in conventional study models and digital models obtained from intraoral scan and desktop scan of study models.
    Murugesan A; Sivakumar A
    J Orthod; 2020 Jun; 47(2):149-155. PubMed ID: 32195636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of the presence of orthodontic brackets on intraoral scans.
    Kang SJ; Kee YJ; Lee KC
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Jan; 91(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 33289796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Application and prospect of digital technology in the field of orthodontics].
    Zhou YH
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 51(6):321-5. PubMed ID: 27256523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience.
    Lim JH; Park JM; Kim M; Heo SJ; Myung JY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 28689906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital impression-taking: Fundamentals and benefits in orthodontics.
    Lecocq G
    Int Orthod; 2016 Jun; 14(2):184-94. PubMed ID: 27080602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models.
    Camardella LT; Vilella OV; van Hezel MM; Breuning KH
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 28361165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.