These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33473251)

  • 1. Statement on
    ; Naegeli H; Bresson JL; Dalmay T; Dewhurst IC; Epstein MM; Firbank LG; Guerche P; Hejatko J; Moreno FJ; Mullins E; Nogué F; Rostoks N; Sánchez Serrano JJ; Savoini G; Veromann E; Veronesi F; Dumont AF
    EFSA J; 2021 Jan; 19(1):e06350. PubMed ID: 33473251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relevance of a digestibility evaluation in the allergenicity risk assessment of novel proteins. Opinion of a joint initiative of COST action ImpARAS and COST action INFOGEST.
    Verhoeckx K; Bøgh KL; Dupont D; Egger L; Gadermaier G; Larré C; Mackie A; Menard O; Adel-Patient K; Picariello G; Portmann R; Smit J; Turner P; Untersmayr E; Epstein MM
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2019 Jul; 129():405-423. PubMed ID: 31063834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guidance on allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants.
    ; Naegeli H; Birch AN; Casacuberta J; De Schrijver A; Gralak MA; Guerche P; Jones H; Manachini B; Messéan A; Nielsen EE; Nogué F; Robaglia C; Rostoks N; Sweet J; Tebbe C; Visioli F; Wal JM; Eigenmann P; Epstein M; Hoffmann-Sommergruber K; Koning F; Lovik M; Mills C; Moreno FJ; van Loveren H; Selb R; Fernandez Dumont A
    EFSA J; 2017 Jun; 15(6):e04862. PubMed ID: 32728397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current codex guidelines for assessment of potential protein allergenicity.
    Ladics GS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S20-3. PubMed ID: 18708115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
    Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Presence of small resistant peptides from new in vitro digestion assays detected by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry: An implication of allergenicity prediction of novel proteins?
    Wang R; Wang Y; Edrington TC; Liu Z; Lee TC; Silvanovich A; Moon HS; Liu ZL; Li B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233745. PubMed ID: 32542029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific Opinion on development needs for the allergenicity and protein safety assessment of food and feed products derived from biotechnology.
    ; Mullins E; Bresson JL; Dalmay T; Dewhurst IC; Epstein MM; George Firbank L; Guerche P; Hejatko J; Naegeli H; Nogué F; Rostoks N; Sánchez Serrano JJ; Savoini G; Veromann E; Veronesi F; Fernandez Dumont A; Moreno FJ
    EFSA J; 2022 Jan; 20(1):e07044. PubMed ID: 35106091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between protein digestibility and allergenicity: comparisons of pepsin and cathepsin.
    Foster ES; Kimber I; Dearman RJ
    Toxicology; 2013 Jul; 309():30-8. PubMed ID: 23624183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Homologous tropomyosins from vertebrate and invertebrate: Recombinant calibrator proteins in functional biological assays for tropomyosin allergenicity assessment of novel animal foods.
    Klueber J; Costa J; Randow S; Codreanu-Morel F; Verhoeckx K; Bindslev-Jensen C; Ollert M; Hoffmann-Sommergruber K; Morisset M; Holzhauser T; Kuehn A
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2020 Jan; 50(1):105-116. PubMed ID: 31541579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in allergenic potential of food extracts following oral exposure in mice reflect differences in digestibility: potential approaches to safety assessment.
    Bowman CC; Selgrade MK
    Toxicol Sci; 2008 Mar; 102(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 18033772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro digestion of Cry1Ab proteins and analysis of the impact on their immunoreactivity.
    Guimaraes V; Drumare MF; Lereclus D; Gohar M; Lamourette P; Nevers MC; Vaisanen-Tunkelrott ML; Bernard H; Guillon B; Créminon C; Wal JM; Adel-Patient K
    J Agric Food Chem; 2010 Mar; 58(5):3222-31. PubMed ID: 20136083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mass spectrometric analysis of digesta does not improve the allergenicity assessment of GM crops.
    Herman RA; Bauman PA; Goodwin L; Islamovic E; Ma EH; Serrano H; Silvanovich A; Simmons AR; Song P; Tetteh AO; Wang R
    Transgenic Res; 2021 Jun; 30(3):283-288. PubMed ID: 33864193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Food Matrices on Digestibility of Allergens and Poorly Allergenic Homologs.
    Akkerdaas JH; Cianferoni A; Islamovic E; Kough J; Ladics GS; McClain S; Poulsen LK; Silvanovich A; Pereira Mouriès L; van Ree R
    Front Allergy; 2022; 3():909410. PubMed ID: 35769559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Allergenicity prediction of novel and modified proteins: Not a mission impossible! Development of a Random Forest allergenicity prediction model.
    Westerhout J; Krone T; Snippe A; Babé L; McClain S; Ladics GS; Houben GF; Verhoeckx KC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Oct; 107():104422. PubMed ID: 31310847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing protein digestibility in allergenicity risk assessment: A comparison of in silico and high throughput in vitro gastric digestion assays.
    Wang K; Crevel RWR; Mills ENC
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2022 Sep; 167():113273. PubMed ID: 35809717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Establishing objective detection limits for the pepsin digestion assay used in the assessment of genetically modified foods.
    Ofori-Anti AO; Ariyarathna H; Chen L; Lee HL; Pramod SN; Goodman RE
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 52(2):94-103. PubMed ID: 18611423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multi-laboratory evaluation of a common in vitro pepsin digestion assay protocol used in assessing the safety of novel proteins.
    Thomas K; Aalbers M; Bannon GA; Bartels M; Dearman RJ; Esdaile DJ; Fu TJ; Glatt CM; Hadfield N; Hatzos C; Hefle SL; Heylings JR; Goodman RE; Henry B; Herouet C; Holsapple M; Ladics GS; Landry TD; MacIntosh SC; Rice EA; Privalle LS; Steiner HY; Teshima R; Van Ree R; Woolhiser M; Zawodny J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Apr; 39(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 15041142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of endogenous allergenicity of genetically modified plants exemplified by soybean - Where do we stand?
    Selb R; Wal JM; Moreno FJ; Lovik M; Mills C; Hoffmann-Sommergruber K; Fernandez A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 101():139-148. PubMed ID: 28111299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.