These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33473251)

  • 21. Protease resistance of food proteins: a mixed picture for predicting allergenicity but a useful tool for assessing exposure.
    Akkerdaas J; Totis M; Barnett B; Bell E; Davis T; Edrington T; Glenn K; Graser G; Herman R; Knulst A; Ladics G; McClain S; Poulsen LK; Ranjan R; Rascle JB; Serrano H; Speijer D; Wang R; Pereira Mouriès L; Capt A; van Ree R
    Clin Transl Allergy; 2018; 8():30. PubMed ID: 30116520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Food Allergens: Is There a Correlation between Stability to Digestion and Allergenicity?
    Bøgh KL; Madsen CB
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2016 Jul; 56(9):1545-67. PubMed ID: 25607526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Expression of Colocasia esculenta tuber agglutinin in Indian mustard provides resistance against Lipaphis erysimi and the expressed protein is non-allergenic.
    Das A; Ghosh P; Das S
    Plant Cell Rep; 2018 Jun; 37(6):849-863. PubMed ID: 29520589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scientific advancement of novel protein allergenicity evaluation: an overview of work from the HESI Protein Allergenicity Technical Committee (2000-2008).
    Thomas K; MacIntosh S; Bannon G; Herouet-Guicheney C; Holsapple M; Ladics G; McClain S; Vieths S; Woolhiser M; Privalle L
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 Jun; 47(6):1041-50. PubMed ID: 19425225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Digestibility and Immunoreactivity of Shrimp Extracts Using an In Vitro Digestibility Model with Pepsin and Pancreatin.
    Toomer OT; Do AB; Fu TJ; Williams KM
    J Food Sci; 2015 Jul; 80(7):T1633-9. PubMed ID: 26077284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digestion stability as a criterion for protein allergenicity assessment.
    Fu TJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2002 May; 964():99-110. PubMed ID: 12023197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An in vitro protocol to characterise the resistance of food proteins to intestinal digestion.
    Wang K; Crevel RWR; Mills ENC
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2023 Mar; 173():113590. PubMed ID: 36584934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Allergic to bureaucracy? Regulatory allergenicity assessments of novel food: Motivations, challenges, compromises, and possibilities.
    Kedar O; Golberg A; Obolski U; Confino-Cohen R
    Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf; 2024 Mar; 23(2):e13300. PubMed ID: 38477215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Allergenicity assessment strategy for novel food proteins and protein sources.
    Verhoeckx K; Broekman H; Knulst A; Houben G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Aug; 79():118-124. PubMed ID: 27012375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of the potential allergenicity of genetically-engineered food crops.
    Ladics GS
    J Immunotoxicol; 2019 Dec; 16(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 30409058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computational analysis of the relationship between allergenicity and digestibility of allergenic proteins in simulated gastric fluid.
    Jiang B; Qu H; Hu Y; Ni T; Lin Z
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Oct; 8():375. PubMed ID: 17922925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genetically modified plants and food hypersensitivity diseases: usage and implications of experimental models for risk assessment.
    Prescott VE; Hogan SP
    Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Aug; 111(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 16364445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34.
    Pickles J; Rafiq S; Cochrane SA; Lalljie A
    Toxicol Rep; 2014; 1():858-870. PubMed ID: 28962297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro digestibility and immunoreactivity of bovine milk proteins.
    Do AB; Williams K; Toomer OT
    Food Chem; 2016 Jan; 190():581-587. PubMed ID: 26213013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Genetically modified food and allergies - an update].
    Niemann B; Pöting A; Braeuning A; Lampen A
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2016 Jul; 59(7):865-71. PubMed ID: 27240596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Murine models for evaluating the allergenicity of novel proteins and foods.
    Aldemir H; Bars R; Herouet-Guicheney C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S52-7. PubMed ID: 19100305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Characterization of the allergenic potential of proteins: an assessment of the kiwifruit allergen actinidin.
    Dearman RJ; Beresford L; Foster ES; McClain S; Kimber I
    J Appl Toxicol; 2014 May; 34(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23754484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetically modified and wild soybeans: an immunologic comparison.
    Yum HY; Lee SY; Lee KE; Sohn MH; Kim KE
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2005; 26(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 16119037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Safety evaluation of genetically modified foods.
    Martens MA
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2000 Jun; 73 Suppl():S14-8. PubMed ID: 10968554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.