141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33475000)
1. The Effect of Graphic Health Warning Labels Placed on the ENDS Device on Young Adult Users' Experience, Exposure and Intention to Use: A Pilot Study.
Li W; Vargas-Rivera M; Ebrahimi Kalan M; Ben Taleb Z; Asfar T; Osibogun O; Noar SM; Maziak W
Health Commun; 2022 Jun; 37(7):842-849. PubMed ID: 33475000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of menthol/mint-flavored pods on young JUUL E-cigarette users' subjective experience, puffing behavior, and nicotine exposure: A pilot study.
Li W; Vargas-Rivera M; Eissenberg TE; Shihadeh A; Talih S; Maziak W
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2022 Aug; 237():109516. PubMed ID: 35679691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of flavour manipulation on ENDS (JUUL) users' experiences, puffing behaviour and nicotine exposure among US college students.
Vargas-Rivera M; Ebrahimi Kalan M; Ward-Peterson M; Osibogun O; Li W; Brown D; Eissenberg T; Maziak W
Tob Control; 2020 May; ():. PubMed ID: 32447315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pictorial health warning labels on the waterpipe device are effective in reducing smoking satisfaction, puffing behaviour and exposure to CO: first evidence from a crossover clinical laboratory study.
Maziak W; Ben Taleb Z; Ebrahimi Kalan M; Eissenberg T; Thrasher J; Shihadeh A; Asfar T
Tob Control; 2019 Aug; 28(e1):e37-e42. PubMed ID: 30635367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The association between new graphic health warning labels on tobacco products and attitudes toward smoking among south Korean adolescents: a national cross-sectional study.
Hwang JE; Cho SI
BMC Public Health; 2020 May; 20(1):748. PubMed ID: 32448193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Graphic Health Warnings on Cigarette Packs: How Long Before the Effects on Adolescents Wear Out?
White V; Bariola E; Faulkner A; Coomber K; Wakefield M
Nicotine Tob Res; 2015 Jul; 17(7):776-83. PubMed ID: 25239958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. JUUL use and reasons for initiation among adult tobacco users.
Patel M; Cuccia A; Willett J; Zhou Y; Kierstead EC; Czaplicki L; Schillo B; Hair EC; Vallone D
Tob Control; 2019 Nov; 28(6):681-684. PubMed ID: 31217283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of potential electronic nicotine delivery system regulations on nicotine product selection.
Pesko MF; Kenkel DS; Wang H; Hughes JM
Addiction; 2016 Apr; 111(4):734-44. PubMed ID: 26639526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disgust but not Health Anxiety Graphic Warning Labels Reduce Motivated Attention in Smokers: A Study of P300 and Late Positive Potential Responses.
Cochran JR; Kydd RR; Lee JMJ; Walker N; Consedine NS
Nicotine Tob Res; 2018 Jun; 20(7):819-826. PubMed ID: 29065198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Young adults' intention to quit using JUUL.
Dobbs PD; Lu Y; Dunlap CM; Newcombe KV; Baer CM; Hodges E; Cheney MK
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2021 Jan; 218():108399. PubMed ID: 33250381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cigarette Graphic Warning Labels Are Not Created Equal: They Can Increase or Decrease Smokers' Quit Intentions Relative to Text-Only Warnings.
Evans AT; Peters E; Shoben AB; Meilleur LR; Klein EG; Tompkins MK; Romer D; Tusler M
Nicotine Tob Res; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 28031378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Desensitisation to cigarette package graphic health warnings: a cohort comparison between London and Singapore.
Ratneswaran C; Chisnall B; Li M; Tan S; Douiri A; Anantham D; Steier J
BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012693. PubMed ID: 27798017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of product dependence among cigarette only, ENDS only, and dual users: Findings from Wave 3 (2015-2016) of the PATH study.
Kaplan B; Alrumaih F; Breland A; Eissenberg T; Cohen JE
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2020 Dec; 217():108347. PubMed ID: 33086157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Have combustible cigarettes met their match? The nicotine delivery profiles and harmful constituent exposures of second-generation and third-generation electronic cigarette users.
Wagener TL; Floyd EL; Stepanov I; Driskill LM; Frank SG; Meier E; Leavens EL; Tackett AP; Molina N; Queimado L
Tob Control; 2017 Mar; 26(e1):e23-e28. PubMed ID: 27729564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomised, crossover, clinical study to assess nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects of the BIDI
Fearon IM; Gilligan K; Seltzer RGN; McKinney W
Harm Reduct J; 2022 Jun; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 35655314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of flavour, device type and warning messages on youth preferences for electronic nicotine delivery systems: evidence from an online discrete choice experiment.
Shang C; Huang J; Chaloupka FJ; Emery SL
Tob Control; 2018 Oct; 27(e2):e152-e159. PubMed ID: 29097588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptions and perceived impact of graphic cigarette health warning labels on smoking behavior among U.S. young adults.
Villanti AC; Cantrell J; Pearson JL; Vallone DM; Rath JM
Nicotine Tob Res; 2014 Apr; 16(4):469-77. PubMed ID: 24212476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reactions to Pictorial and Text Cigarette Pack Warning Labels among Chinese Smokers.
Wang L; Yao X; Wang G; Du K
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(18):. PubMed ID: 36141520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Who is JUULing and Why? An Examination of Young Adult Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Users.
Case KR; Hinds JT; Creamer MR; Loukas A; Perry CL
J Adolesc Health; 2020 Jan; 66(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 31481286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in Biomarkers of Cigarette Smoke Exposure After 6 Days of Switching Exclusively or Partially to Use of the JUUL System with Two Nicotine Concentrations: A Randomized Controlled Confinement Study in Adult Smokers.
Cohen G; Goldenson NI; Bailey PC; Chan S; Shiffman S
Nicotine Tob Res; 2021 Nov; 23(12):2153-2161. PubMed ID: 34161586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
