These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33475399)

  • 1. Collective deviance: Scaling up subjective group dynamics to superordinate categories reveals a deviant ingroup protection effect.
    Abrams D; Travaglino GA; Marques JM; Davies B; Randsley de Moura G
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Aug; 123(2):353-372. PubMed ID: 33475399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Membership status and subjective group dynamics: who triggers the black sheep effect?
    Pinto IR; Marques JM; Levine JM; Abrams D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Jul; 99(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 20565188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Being better by being right: subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined.
    Marques JM; Abrams D; Serĵdio RG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Sep; 81(3):436-47. PubMed ID: 11554645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members: development of the black sheep effect.
    Abrams D; Palmer SB; Rutland A; Cameron L; Van de Vyver J
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Jan; 50(1):258-70. PubMed ID: 23544855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups.
    Abrams D; Marques JM; Bown N; Henson M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 May; 78(5):906-12. PubMed ID: 10821197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rejecting ingroup loyalty for the truth: Children's and adolescents' evaluations of deviant peers within a misinformation intergroup context.
    Farooq A; Adlam A; Rutland A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2024 Jul; 243():105923. PubMed ID: 38593709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pronorm and antinorm deviants: a test of the subjective group dynamics model.
    Hichy Z; Mari S; Capozza D
    J Soc Psychol; 2008 Oct; 148(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 18958982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reactions to intragroup deviance: does disidentification have a role?
    Cameira M; Ribeiro TA
    J Soc Psychol; 2014; 154(3):233-50. PubMed ID: 24873026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corralling the ingroup: deviant derogation and perception of group variability.
    Hutchison P; Abrams D; De Moura GR
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(3):334-50. PubMed ID: 23724703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protecting the ingroup stereotype: ingroup identification and the management of deviant ingroup members.
    Castano E; Paladino MP; Coull A; Yzerbyt VY
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2002 Sep; 41(Pt 3):365-85. PubMed ID: 12419008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When does the in-group like the out-group? Bias among children as a function of group norms.
    Rutland A; Hitti A; Mulvey KL; Abrams D; Killen M
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jun; 26(6):834-42. PubMed ID: 25888686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When does activating diversity alleviate, when does it increase intergroup bias? An ingroup projection perspective.
    Steffens MC; Reese G; Ehrke F; Jonas KJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178738. PubMed ID: 28582443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Denunciation and the construction of norms in group conflict: examples from an Al-Qaeda-supporting group.
    Finlay WM
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):691-710. PubMed ID: 24417639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The ingroup as pars pro toto: projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination.
    Wenzel M; Mummendey A; Weber U; Waldzus S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Apr; 29(4):461-73. PubMed ID: 15273001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Children's evaluations of resource allocation in the context of group norms.
    Cooley S; Killen M
    Dev Psychol; 2015 Apr; 51(4):554-63. PubMed ID: 25664833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Role of Competitive and Cooperative Norms in the Development of Deviant Evaluations.
    McGuire L; Rizzo MT; Killen M; Rutland A
    Child Dev; 2019 Nov; 90(6):e703-e717. PubMed ID: 29781129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social norm perception in groups with outliers.
    Dannals JE; Miller DT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Sep; 146(9):1342-1359. PubMed ID: 28682092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Justice reactions to deviant ingroup members: Ingroup identity threat motivates utilitarian punishments.
    Fousiani K; Yzerbyt V; Kteily NS; Demoulin S
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2019 Oct; 58(4):869-893. PubMed ID: 30648270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinguishing between silent and vocal minorities: not all deviants feel marginal.
    Morrison KR; Miller DT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 May; 94(5):871-82. PubMed ID: 18444744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why are all the white (Asian) kids sitting together in the cafeteria? Resegregation and the role of intergroup attributions and norms.
    Ramiah AA; Schmid K; Hewstone M; Floe C
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2015 Mar; 54(1):100-24. PubMed ID: 24597949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.