300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33476665)
1. Estimating hourly PM
Lu Y; Giuliano G; Habre R
Environ Res; 2021 Apr; 195():110653. PubMed ID: 33476665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A land use regression model using machine learning and locally developed low cost particulate matter sensors in Uganda.
Coker ES; Amegah AK; Mwebaze E; Ssematimba J; Bainomugisha E
Environ Res; 2021 Aug; 199():111352. PubMed ID: 34043968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM
Bi J; Wildani A; Chang HH; Liu Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Feb; 54(4):2152-2162. PubMed ID: 31927908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network.
Considine EM; Reid CE; Ogletree MR; Dye T
Environ Pollut; 2021 Jan; 268(Pt B):115833. PubMed ID: 33120139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring the distributional environmental justice implications of an air quality monitoring network in Los Angeles County.
Mullen C; Flores A; Grineski S; Collins T
Environ Res; 2022 Apr; 206():112612. PubMed ID: 34953883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of 4th of July Fireworks on Spatiotemporal PM
Mousavi A; Yuan Y; Masri S; Barta G; Wu J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 34071796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Five Years of Accurate PM
Robinson DL; Goodman N; Vardoulakis S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Nov; 20(23):. PubMed ID: 38063557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Publicly available low-cost sensor measurements for PM
Bi J; Carmona N; Blanco MN; Gassett AJ; Seto E; Szpiro AA; Larson TV; Sampson PD; Kaufman JD; Sheppard L
Environ Int; 2022 Jan; 158():106897. PubMed ID: 34601393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Community-Based Measurements Reveal Unseen Differences during Air Pollution Episodes.
Kelly KE; Xing WW; Sayahi T; Mitchell L; Becnel T; Gaillardon PE; Meyer M; Whitaker RT
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 55(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 33325230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of geostationary satellite and high-resolution meteorology data in estimating hourly PM
Vu BN; Bi J; Wang W; Huff A; Kondragunta S; Liu Y
Remote Sens Environ; 2022 Mar; 271():. PubMed ID: 37033879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The improvement of spatial-temporal resolution of PM
Lin YC; Chi WJ; Lin YQ
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105305. PubMed ID: 31739136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.
Stanier CO; Lee SR;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (179):3-79. PubMed ID: 25145039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study.
Zusman M; Schumacher CS; Gassett AJ; Spalt EW; Austin E; Larson TV; Carvlin G; Seto E; Kaufman JD; Sheppard L
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105329. PubMed ID: 31783241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-Cost Sensor Performance Intercomparison, Correction Factor Development, and 2+ Years of Ambient PM
Raheja G; Nimo J; Appoh EK; Essien B; Sunu M; Nyante J; Amegah M; Quansah R; Arku RE; Penn SL; Giordano MR; Zheng Z; Jack D; Chillrud S; Amegah K; Subramanian R; Pinder R; Appah-Sampong E; Tetteh EN; Borketey MA; Hughes AF; Westervelt DM
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jul; 57(29):10708-10720. PubMed ID: 37437161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating national-scale ground-level PM25 concentration in China using geographically weighted regression based on MODIS and MISR AOD.
You W; Zang Z; Zhang L; Li Y; Wang W
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 May; 23(9):8327-38. PubMed ID: 26780051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application and evaluation of a low-cost PM sensor and data fusion with CMAQ simulations to quantify the impacts of prescribed burning on air quality in Southwestern Georgia, USA.
Huang R; Lal R; Qin M; Hu Y; Russell AG; Odman MT; Afrin S; Garcia-Menendez F; O'Neill SM
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Jul; 71(7):815-829. PubMed ID: 33914671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using a network of lower-cost monitors to identify the influence of modifiable factors driving spatial patterns in fine particulate matter concentrations in an urban environment.
Rose Eilenberg S; Subramanian R; Malings C; Hauryliuk A; Presto AA; Robinson AL
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):949-961. PubMed ID: 32764710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hourly land-use regression modeling for NO
Ndiaye A; Shen Y; Kyriakou K; Karssenberg D; Schmitz O; Flückiger B; Hoogh K; Hoek G
Environ Res; 2024 Sep; 256():119233. PubMed ID: 38802030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and field validation of a community-engaged particulate matter air quality monitoring network in Imperial, California, USA.
Carvlin GN; Lugo H; Olmedo L; Bejarano E; Wilkie A; Meltzer D; Wong M; King G; Northcross A; Jerrett M; English PB; Hammond D; Seto E
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Dec; 67(12):1342-1352. PubMed ID: 28829718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
