312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33476769)
1. An evaluation of Cochrane Crowd found that crowdsourcing produced accurate results in identifying randomized trials.
Noel-Storr A; Dooley G; Elliott J; Steele E; Shemilt I; Mavergames C; Wisniewski S; McDonald S; Murano M; Glanville J; Foxlee R; Beecher D; Ware J; Thomas J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():130-139. PubMed ID: 33476769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Citation screening using crowdsourcing and machine learning produced accurate results: Evaluation of Cochrane's modified Screen4Me service.
Noel-Storr A; Dooley G; Affengruber L; Gartlehner G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():23-31. PubMed ID: 33007457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Working with a new kind of team: harnessing the wisdom of the crowd in trial identification.
Noel-Storr A
EFSA J; 2019 Jul; 17(Suppl 1):e170715. PubMed ID: 32626452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochrane Centralised Search Service showed high sensitivity identifying randomized controlled trials: A retrospective analysis.
Noel-Storr AH; Dooley G; Wisniewski S; Glanville J; Thomas J; Cox S; Featherstone R; Foxlee R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():142-150. PubMed ID: 32798713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Crowdsourcing citation-screening in a mixed-studies systematic review: a feasibility study.
Noel-Storr AH; Redmond P; Lamé G; Liberati E; Kelly S; Miller L; Dooley G; Paterson A; Burt J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):88. PubMed ID: 33906604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crowdsourcing the identification of studies for COVID-19-related Cochrane Rapid Reviews.
Noel-Storr A; Gartlehner G; Dooley G; Persad E; Nussbaumer-Streit B
Res Synth Methods; 2022 Sep; 13(5):585-594. PubMed ID: 35403367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews.
Thomas J; McDonald S; Noel-Storr A; Shemilt I; Elliott J; Mavergames C; Marshall IJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():140-151. PubMed ID: 33171275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Crowd-sourcing and automation facilitated the identification and classification of randomized controlled trials in a living review.
Kamso MM; Pardo JP; Whittle SL; Buchbinder R; Wells G; Glennon V; Tugwell P; Deardon R; Sajobi T; Tomlinson G; Elliott J; Kelly SE; Hazlewood GS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Dec; 164():1-8. PubMed ID: 37865299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Crowdsourcing the Citation Screening Process for Systematic Reviews: Validation Study.
Nama N; Sampson M; Barrowman N; Sandarage R; Menon K; Macartney G; Murto K; Vaccani JP; Katz S; Zemek R; Nasr A; McNally JD
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Apr; 21(4):e12953. PubMed ID: 31033444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) via a hybrid machine learning and crowdsourcing approach.
Wallace BC; Noel-Storr A; Marshall IJ; Cohen AM; Smalheiser NR; Thomas J
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Nov; 24(6):1165-1168. PubMed ID: 28541493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of Online Screening for Autism: Crowdsourcing Study Comparing Paid and Unpaid Diagnostic Tasks.
Washington P; Kalantarian H; Tariq Q; Schwartz J; Dunlap K; Chrisman B; Varma M; Ning M; Kline A; Stockham N; Paskov K; Voss C; Haber N; Wall DP
J Med Internet Res; 2019 May; 21(5):e13668. PubMed ID: 31124463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Crowdsourcing image annotation for nucleus detection and segmentation in computational pathology: evaluating experts, automated methods, and the crowd.
Irshad H; Montaser-Kouhsari L; Waltz G; Bucur O; Nowak JA; Dong F; Knoblauch NW; Beck AH
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2015; ():294-305. PubMed ID: 25592590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review.
Créquit P; Mansouri G; Benchoufi M; Vivot A; Ravaud P
J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e187. PubMed ID: 29764795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the crowd better as an assistant or a replacement in ontology engineering? An exploration through the lens of the Gene Ontology.
Mortensen JM; Telis N; Hughey JJ; Fan-Minogue H; Van Auken K; Dumontier M; Musen MA
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Apr; 60():199-209. PubMed ID: 26873781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Crowdsourcing in health and medical research: a systematic review.
Wang C; Han L; Stein G; Day S; Bien-Gund C; Mathews A; Ong JJ; Zhao PZ; Wei SF; Walker J; Chou R; Lee A; Chen A; Bayus B; Tucker JD
Infect Dis Poverty; 2020 Jan; 9(1):8. PubMed ID: 31959234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Crowdsourcing--harnessing the masses to advance health and medicine, a systematic review.
Ranard BL; Ha YP; Meisel ZF; Asch DA; Hill SS; Becker LB; Seymour AK; Merchant RM
J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Jan; 29(1):187-203. PubMed ID: 23843021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Web 2.0-based crowdsourcing for high-quality gold standard development in clinical natural language processing.
Zhai H; Lingren T; Deleger L; Li Q; Kaiser M; Stoutenborough L; Solti I
J Med Internet Res; 2013 Apr; 15(4):e73. PubMed ID: 23548263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficient crowdsourcing of crowd-generated microtasks.
Hotaling A; Bagrow JP
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244245. PubMed ID: 33332455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The application of crowdsourcing approaches to cancer research: a systematic review.
Lee YJ; Arida JA; Donovan HS
Cancer Med; 2017 Nov; 6(11):2595-2605. PubMed ID: 28960834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide.
Marshall IJ; Noel-Storr A; Kuiper J; Thomas J; Wallace BC
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):602-614. PubMed ID: 29314757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
