210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3347755)
1. When nurses must question doctors' orders.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Feb; 28(9):1. PubMed ID: 3347755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Can doctors amend nurses' notes?
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Nov; 28(6):1. PubMed ID: 3423260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nurses testify as hostile witnesses.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Apr; 28(11):1. PubMed ID: 3368574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomy of a malpractice trial.
Groff B
Am J Nurs; 1985 Mar; 85(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 3844895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nurse's notes make the difference.
Nursing; 1988 Nov; 18(11):98-9. PubMed ID: 3211426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Law and orders.
Cushing M
Am J Nurs; 1990 May; 90(5):29-30, 32. PubMed ID: 2337135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Doctor called after crowning: $8.3 million award.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jan; 28(8):1. PubMed ID: 3344349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. You and the law: negligence in the hospital labor room: a tragic lesson for all concerned.
Sklar C
Can Nurse; 1982 Jan; 78(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 6914908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. This lawsuit reduced your margin for error.
Tammelleo AD
RN; 1988 Nov; 51(11):61-2. PubMed ID: 3201081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. When nurses should blow the whistle.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Apr; 27(11):1. PubMed ID: 3647528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal monitor delay: "proximate cause" issue.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Mar; 31(10):1. PubMed ID: 2024012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Million-dollar errors.
Cushing M
Am J Nurs; 1987 Apr; 87(4):435-6, 440. PubMed ID: 3645957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal case briefs for nurses. GA: slip & fall case against hospital: the nurse's role as a percipient witness; MO: malpractice suit against multiple parties: venue based on nurse's residence.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jul; 37(2):3. PubMed ID: 8850780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Should nurses have questioned dr.'s orders? Cerny V. Williams, No. 2004-10053 (09/19/2006) -NY.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Oct; 47(5):4. PubMed ID: 17117603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nurses' negligence explored by California court. Nichols v. Good Samaritan Hospital.
Hosp Law Newsl; 2005 Sep; 22(11):5-6. PubMed ID: 16130833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Did nurses 'stonewall' parents of dead infant?
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 May; 45(12):1. PubMed ID: 15981975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. C-section delayed: accusations fly.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Mar; 29(10):1. PubMed ID: 2704833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Nurses' duties in carrying out doctors' orders.
Davis CD
Tex Hosp; 1981 Feb; 36(9):42. PubMed ID: 10249869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Nurse and the law. Relying on the count.
Langslow A
Aust Nurses J; 1992 Jun; 21(11):31-2. PubMed ID: 1530515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
