These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33478459)

  • 21. Different implant impression techniques for edentulous patients treated with CAD/CAM complete-arch prostheses: a randomised controlled trial reporting data at 3 year post-loading.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Mangani F; Barlattani A
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 24570979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital vs Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Retrospective Analysis of 36 Edentulous Jaws.
    Papaspyridakos P; De Souza A; Finkelman M; Sicilia E; Gotsis S; Chen YW; Vazouras K; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 35524647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Full-arch restoration with the NEXUS IOS® system: A retrospective clinical evaluation of 37 restorations after a one year of follow-up.
    Klein M; Tuminelli FJ; Sallustio A; Giglio GD; Lerner H; Berg RW; Waltuch A
    J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104741. PubMed ID: 37832627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
    Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Digital Workflow for Double Complete Arch Zirconia Prostheses Utilizing a Novel Scan Body.
    Marinis A; Papaspyridakos P; Sicilia E; Bernandes SR; Touloumi F; Chochlidakis K; Weber HP
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 34453373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using Solid or Predrilled Blocks in a Fully Digital Workflow: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Up To 33 Months of Follow Up.
    Bompolaki D; Punj A; Fellows C; Truong C; Ferracane JL
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 33840144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro comparative study between complete arch conventional implant impressions and digital implant scans with scannable pick-up impression copings.
    Conejo J; Yoo TH; Atria PJ; Fraiman H; Blatz MB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):475.e1-475.e7. PubMed ID: 38182453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of impression scan bodies for complete arch fixed implant-supported restorations.
    Jeong M; Ishikawa-Nagai S; Lee JD; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38092618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.
    Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 3D Accuracy of a Conventional Method Versus Three Digital Scanning Strategies for Completely Edentulous Maxillary Implant Impressions.
    Blanco-Plard A; Hernandez A; Pino F; Vargas N; Rivas-Tumanyan S; Elias A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Dec; 38(6):1211-1219. PubMed ID: 38085753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital workflow for implant-supported fixed complete dentures based on backwards planning in an edentulous patient.
    Al-Haj Husain N; Molinero-Mourelle P; Janner SFM; Brägger U; Özcan M; Schimmel M; Revilla-Léon M; Abou-Ayash S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Feb; 24(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 34006066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of computerized and conventional impression-making procedures for multiple straight and tilted dental implants.
    Gintaute A; Papatriantafyllou N; Aljehani M; Att W
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2018; 13(4):550-565. PubMed ID: 30302442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital vs Conventional Implant Impressions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Papaspyridakos P; Vazouras K; Chen YW; Kotina E; Natto Z; Kang K; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):660-678. PubMed ID: 32613641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up.
    Papaspyridakos P; Kang K; DeFuria C; Amin S; Kudara Y; Weber HP
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jan; 30(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28792115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of 2 direct digital scanning techniques-intraoral scanning and stereophotogrammetry-for complete arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: A prospective study.
    Yan Y; Lin X; Yue X; Geng W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; 130(4):564-572. PubMed ID: 35667889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Continuous Scan Strategy (CSS): A Novel Technique to Improve the Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions.
    Imburgia M; Kois J; Marino E; Lerner H; Mangano FG
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2020 Aug; 28(3):128-141. PubMed ID: 32750237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Full-Contour Crowns Bonded on CAD/CAM Zirconia Complete-Arch Implant Bridges With 3 to 5 Years of Follow-Up.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Barlattani A
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):450-8. PubMed ID: 24188105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Crown Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations in a Complete Digital Workflow: A Randomized Control Trial.
    Ren S; Jiang X; Lin Y; Di P
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):405-411. PubMed ID: 34748653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.