BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33480622)

  • 1. Does the Presence of Spontaneous Components Affect the Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions?
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):990-1005. PubMed ID: 33480622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in pre-school children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 132():109915. PubMed ID: 32028191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synchronized Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Provide a Signal-to-Noise Ratio Advantage in Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Assays.
    Lewis JD
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 19(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 29134475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Clinically Viable Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Assay Using Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Marshall L; Perez ZD; Villabona T
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 45(1):115-129. PubMed ID: 37475147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Jun; 60(6):438-445. PubMed ID: 33084414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chirp-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Pilka E; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jan; 77(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 23116905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medial olivocochlear reflex reliability: The effects of averaging and presence of synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Pilka E; Pastucha M; Skarzynski H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Oct; 152(4):2150. PubMed ID: 36319248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Pilka E; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 89():67-71. PubMed ID: 27619031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Olivocochlear Efferent Activity Is Associated With the Slope of the Psychometric Function of Speech Recognition in Noise.
    Mertes IB; Wilbanks EC; Leek MR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):583-593. PubMed ID: 29135685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efferent-induced shifts in synchronized-spontaneous-otoacoustic-emission magnitude and frequency.
    Lewis JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):3258. PubMed ID: 33261385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Otoacoustic emissions in neonates measured with different acquisition protocols.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Hatzopoulos S; Sliwa L; Pilka E; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 76(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 22266169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions Is Greater in Women than in Men.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Pastucha M; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Audiol Res; 2022 Jan; 12(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 35200258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
    Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Otoacoustic emissions in newborns evoked by 0.5kHz tone bursts.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Konopka W; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1522-6. PubMed ID: 26199137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of measures of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with contralateral suppression.
    Stuart A; Cobb KM
    J Commun Disord; 2015; 58():35-42. PubMed ID: 26431768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
    Stuart A; Preast JL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in adults: A normative study.
    Zevenster S; Naudé A
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2022 Dec; 69(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 36546517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standardization of the TEOAE Contralateral Suppression Test in Terms of Stimulus Intensity and Contralateral Noise Duration in Individuals with Normal Hearing.
    Celikgun B; Derinsu U
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 35512841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medial olivocochlear reflex effects on synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Mertes IB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Mar; 147(3):EL235. PubMed ID: 32237820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.