These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33481178)

  • 1. An improved method for precise genome editing in zebrafish using CRISPR-Cas9 technique.
    Gasanov EV; Jędrychowska J; Pastor M; Wiweger M; Methner A; Korzh VP
    Mol Biol Rep; 2021 Feb; 48(2):1951-1957. PubMed ID: 33481178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9-based knock-in approaches in zebrafish.
    Albadri S; Del Bene F; Revenu C
    Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():77-85. PubMed ID: 28300641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generation of zebrafish models by CRISPR /Cas9 genome editing.
    Hruscha A; Schmid B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1254():341-50. PubMed ID: 25431076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gene Therapy with CRISPR/Cas9 Coming to Age for HIV Cure.
    Soriano V
    AIDS Rev; 2017; 19(3):167-172. PubMed ID: 29019352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using local chromatin structure to improve CRISPR/Cas9 efficiency in zebrafish.
    Chen Y; Zeng S; Hu R; Wang X; Huang W; Liu J; Wang L; Liu G; Cao Y; Zhang Y
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182528. PubMed ID: 28800611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generation of Functional Genetic Study Models in Zebrafish Using CRISPR-Cas9.
    Carmona-Aldana F; Nuñez-Martinez HN; Peralta-Alvarez CA; Tapia-Urzua G; Recillas-Targa F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2174():255-262. PubMed ID: 32813255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of CRISPR gene-editing tools in zebrafish.
    Uribe-Salazar JM; Kaya G; Sekar A; Weyenberg K; Ingamells C; Dennis MY
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Jan; 23(1):12. PubMed ID: 34986794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Various Nuclear Localization Signal-Fused Cas9 Proteins and
    Hu P; Zhao X; Zhang Q; Li W; Zu Y
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Mar; 8(3):823-831. PubMed ID: 29295818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatiotemporal Control of CRISPR/Cas9 Function in Cells and Zebrafish using Light-Activated Guide RNA.
    Zhou W; Brown W; Bardhan A; Delaney M; Ilk AS; Rauen RR; Kahn SI; Tsang M; Deiters A
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2020 Jun; 59(23):8998-9003. PubMed ID: 32160370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Harnessing accurate non-homologous end joining for efficient precise deletion in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing.
    Guo T; Feng YL; Xiao JJ; Liu Q; Sun XN; Xiang JF; Kong N; Liu SC; Chen GQ; Wang Y; Dong MM; Cai Z; Lin H; Cai XJ; Xie AY
    Genome Biol; 2018 Oct; 19(1):170. PubMed ID: 30340517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genomic Deletions Protocol in Zebrafish.
    Amorim JP; Bordeira-Carriço R; Gali-Macedo A; Perrod C; Bessa J
    STAR Protoc; 2020 Dec; 1(3):100208. PubMed ID: 33377102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precise and Predictable CRISPR Chromosomal Rearrangements Reveal Principles of Cas9-Mediated Nucleotide Insertion.
    Shou J; Li J; Liu Y; Wu Q
    Mol Cell; 2018 Aug; 71(4):498-509.e4. PubMed ID: 30033371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene deletions in lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus.
    Gorter de Vries AR; de Groot PA; van den Broek M; Daran JG
    Microb Cell Fact; 2017 Dec; 16(1):222. PubMed ID: 29207996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of genome editing through CRISPR-Cas9 engineering.
    Zhang JH; Adikaram P; Pandey M; Genis A; Simonds WF
    Bioengineered; 2016 Apr; 7(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 27340770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CRISPR GUARD protects off-target sites from Cas9 nuclease activity using short guide RNAs.
    Coelho MA; De Braekeleer E; Firth M; Bista M; Lukasiak S; Cuomo ME; Taylor BJM
    Nat Commun; 2020 Aug; 11(1):4132. PubMed ID: 32807781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9.
    Paquet D; Kwart D; Chen A; Sproul A; Jacob S; Teo S; Olsen KM; Gregg A; Noggle S; Tessier-Lavigne M
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7601):125-9. PubMed ID: 27120160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precision genome editing in the CRISPR era.
    Salsman J; Dellaire G
    Biochem Cell Biol; 2017 Apr; 95(2):187-201. PubMed ID: 28177771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid and Efficient Gene Deletion by CRISPR/Cas9.
    Neldeborg S; Lin L; Stougaard M; Luo Y
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1961():233-247. PubMed ID: 30912049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chromatin accessibility is associated with CRISPR-Cas9 efficiency in the zebrafish (Danio rerio).
    Uusi-Mäkelä MIE; Barker HR; Bäuerlein CA; Häkkinen T; Nykter M; Rämet M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196238. PubMed ID: 29684067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved gRNA secondary structures allow editing of target sites resistant to CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage.
    Riesenberg S; Helmbrecht N; Kanis P; Maricic T; Pääbo S
    Nat Commun; 2022 Jan; 13(1):489. PubMed ID: 35078986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.