318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33481431)
1. Slow Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Acral Melanoma Treatment in Korean Patients.
Seo J; Oh Y; Kim SK; Roh MR; Chung KY
Dermatol Surg; 2021 Feb; 47(2):e42-e46. PubMed ID: 33481431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association of Mohs Micrographic Surgery vs Wide Local Excision With Overall Survival Outcomes for Patients With Melanoma of the Trunk and Extremities.
Demer AM; Hanson JL; Maher IA; Liszewski W
JAMA Dermatol; 2021 Jan; 157(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 33084853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of Melanoma In Situ Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery Compared With Wide Local Excision.
Nosrati A; Berliner JG; Goel S; McGuire J; Morhenn V; de Souza JR; Yeniay Y; Singh R; Lee K; Nakamura M; Wu RR; Griffin A; Grimes B; Linos E; Chren MM; Grekin R; Wei ML
JAMA Dermatol; 2017 May; 153(5):436-441. PubMed ID: 28241261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term outcomes of Mohs micrographic surgery for invasive melanoma of the trunk and proximal portion of the extremities.
Burnett ME; Brodland DG; Zitelli JA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Mar; 84(3):661-668. PubMed ID: 32763327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved overall survival of melanoma of the head and neck treated with Mohs micrographic surgery versus wide local excision.
Hanson J; Demer A; Liszewski W; Foman N; Maher I
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Jan; 82(1):149-155. PubMed ID: 31473297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The rule of 10s versus the rule of 2s: High complication rates after conventional excision with postoperative margin assessment of specialty site versus trunk and proximal extremity melanomas.
Rzepecki AK; Hwang CD; Etzkorn JR; Shin TM; Sobanko JF; Howe NM; Miller CJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Aug; 85(2):442-452. PubMed ID: 30447316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefit of Mohs Micrographic Surgery Over Wide Local Excision for Melanoma of the Head and Neck: A Rational Approach to Treatment.
Demer AM; Vance KK; Cheraghi N; Reich HC; Lee PK
Dermatol Surg; 2019 Mar; 45(3):381-389. PubMed ID: 30550523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: wide local excision vs. Mohs micrographic surgery.
Paradisi A; Abeni D; Rusciani A; Cigna E; Wolter M; Scuderi N; Rusciani L; Kaufmann R; Podda M
Cancer Treat Rev; 2008 Dec; 34(8):728-36. PubMed ID: 18684568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for melanoma in situ (MIS) of the trunk and proximal extremities.
Stigall LE; Brodland DG; Zitelli JA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 75(5):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 27473456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic review and meta-analysis of local recurrence rates of head and neck cutaneous melanomas after wide local excision, Mohs micrographic surgery, or staged excision.
Bittar PG; Bittar JM; Etzkorn JR; Brewer JD; Aizman L; Shin TM; Sobanko JF; Higgins HW; Giordano CN; Cohen JV; Pride R; Wan MT; Leitenberger JJ; Bar AA; Aasi S; Bordeaux JS; Miller CJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Sep; 85(3):681-692. PubMed ID: 33961921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic Review of the Role of Mohs Micrographic Surgery in the Management of Early-Stage Melanoma of the Head and Neck.
Theunissen CCW; Lee MH; Murad FG; Waldman AH
Dermatol Surg; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1185-1189. PubMed ID: 34148999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mohs micrographic surgery for melanoma: A prospective multicenter study.
Ellison PM; Zitelli JA; Brodland DG
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2019 Sep; 81(3):767-774. PubMed ID: 31150700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of outcomes for malignant melanoma of the face treated using Mohs micrographic surgery and wide local excision.
Chin-Lenn L; Murynka T; McKinnon JG; Arlette JP
Dermatol Surg; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1637-45. PubMed ID: 24164702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The efficacy of Mohs micrographic surgery over the traditional wide local excision surgery in the cure of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.
Malan M; Xuejingzi W; Quan SJ
Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 33():297. PubMed ID: 31692830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Demographics and outcomes of stage I and II Merkel cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery compared with wide local excision in the National Cancer Database.
Singh B; Qureshi MM; Truong MT; Sahni D
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Jul; 79(1):126-134.e3. PubMed ID: 29408552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and Neck With Wide Local Excision Versus Mohs.
Namin AW; Oudin EM; Tassone PT; Galloway TLI; Dooley LM; Zitsch RP
Laryngoscope; 2021 Nov; 131(11):2490-2496. PubMed ID: 33844289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mohs micrographic surgery versus wide local excision for eyelid melanoma: An analysis of a national database.
Ramachandran V; Phan K
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Dec; 75(12):4410-4415. PubMed ID: 36257889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Melanomas of the head and neck have high-local recurrence risk features and require tissue-rearranging reconstruction more commonly than basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma: A comparison of indications for microscopic margin control prior to reconstruction in 13,664 tumors.
Fix W; Etzkorn JR; Shin TM; Howe N; Bhatt M; Sobanko JF; Miller CJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Aug; 85(2):409-418. PubMed ID: 30458206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comparison of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Wide Local Excision for Treatment of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans With Long-Term Follow-up: The Mayo Clinic Experience.
Lowe GC; Onajin O; Baum CL; Otley CC; Arpey CJ; Roenigk RK; Brewer JD
Dermatol Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 27749444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. National utilization patterns of Mohs micrographic surgery for invasive melanoma and melanoma in situ.
Viola KV; Rezzadeh KS; Gonsalves L; Patel P; Gross CP; Yoo J; Stamell E; Turner RB
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2015 Jun; 72(6):1060-5. PubMed ID: 25824274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
