These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33481596)

  • 21. The NORMAN Suspect List Exchange (NORMAN-SLE): facilitating European and worldwide collaboration on suspect screening in high resolution mass spectrometry.
    Mohammed Taha H; Aalizadeh R; Alygizakis N; Antignac JP; Arp HPH; Bade R; Baker N; Belova L; Bijlsma L; Bolton EE; Brack W; Celma A; Chen WL; Cheng T; Chirsir P; Čirka Ľ; D'Agostino LA; Djoumbou Feunang Y; Dulio V; Fischer S; Gago-Ferrero P; Galani A; Geueke B; Głowacka N; Glüge J; Groh K; Grosse S; Haglund P; Hakkinen PJ; Hale SE; Hernandez F; Janssen EM; Jonkers T; Kiefer K; Kirchner M; Koschorreck J; Krauss M; Krier J; Lamoree MH; Letzel M; Letzel T; Li Q; Little J; Liu Y; Lunderberg DM; Martin JW; McEachran AD; McLean JA; Meier C; Meijer J; Menger F; Merino C; Muncke J; Muschket M; Neumann M; Neveu V; Ng K; Oberacher H; O'Brien J; Oswald P; Oswaldova M; Picache JA; Postigo C; Ramirez N; Reemtsma T; Renaud J; Rostkowski P; Rüdel H; Salek RM; Samanipour S; Scheringer M; Schliebner I; Schulz W; Schulze T; Sengl M; Shoemaker BA; Sims K; Singer H; Singh RR; Sumarah M; Thiessen PA; Thomas KV; Torres S; Trier X; van Wezel AP; Vermeulen RCH; Vlaanderen JJ; von der Ohe PC; Wang Z; Williams AJ; Willighagen EL; Wishart DS; Zhang J; Thomaidis NS; Hollender J; Slobodnik J; Schymanski EL
    Environ Sci Eur; 2022; 34(1):104. PubMed ID: 36284750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations.
    Zeeman M; Auer CM; Clements RG; Nabholz JV; Boethling RS
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(3):179-201. PubMed ID: 8564854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Environmental impact on vascular development predicted by high-throughput screening.
    Kleinstreuer NC; Judson RS; Reif DM; Sipes NS; Singh AV; Chandler KJ; Dewoskin R; Dix DJ; Kavlock RJ; Knudsen TB
    Environ Health Perspect; 2011 Nov; 119(11):1596-603. PubMed ID: 21788198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prediction of acute toxicity in fish by using QSAR methods and chemical modes of action.
    Lozano S; Lescot E; Halm MP; Lepailleur A; Bureau R; Rault S
    J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem; 2010 Apr; 25(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 19874208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Case study on the utility of predictive toxicology tools in alternatives assessments for hazardous chemicals in children's consumer products.
    Smith MN; Cohen Hubal EA; Faustman EM
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):160-170. PubMed ID: 31501452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In Silico Prediction of Physicochemical Properties of Environmental Chemicals Using Molecular Fingerprints and Machine Learning.
    Zang Q; Mansouri K; Williams AJ; Judson RS; Allen DG; Casey WM; Kleinstreuer NC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jan; 57(1):36-49. PubMed ID: 28006899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The exposure data landscape for manufactured chemicals.
    Egeghy PP; Judson R; Gangwal S; Mosher S; Smith D; Vail J; Cohen Hubal EA
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jan; 414():159-66. PubMed ID: 22104386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Building a robust 21st century chemical testing program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: recommendations for strengthening scientific engagement.
    McPartland J; Dantzker HC; Portier CJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 2015 Jan; 123(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25343778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prediction of Estrogenic Bioactivity of Environmental Chemical Metabolites.
    Pinto CL; Mansouri K; Judson R; Browne P
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1410-27. PubMed ID: 27509301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro and modelling approaches to risk assessment from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ToxCast programme.
    Judson R; Houck K; Martin M; Knudsen T; Thomas RS; Sipes N; Shah I; Wambaugh J; Crofton K
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 115(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 24684691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Facilities Status Dashboard for the COVID-19 Pandemic: Approach and Challenges.
    Baxter L; Baynes J; Weaver A; Neale A; Wade T; Mehaffey M; Lobdell D; Widener K; Cascio W
    Int J Public Health; 2022; 67():1604761. PubMed ID: 35685336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rapid experimental measurements of physicochemical properties to inform models and testing.
    Nicolas CI; Mansouri K; Phillips KA; Grulke CM; Richard AM; Williams AJ; Rabinowitz J; Isaacs KK; Yau A; Wambaugh JF
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Sep; 636():901-909. PubMed ID: 29729507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Integrated QSAR Models to Predict Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity.
    Ballabio D; Grisoni F; Consonni V; Todeschini R
    Mol Inform; 2019 Aug; 38(8-9):e1800124. PubMed ID: 30549437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. EPA's non-targeted analysis collaborative trial (ENTACT): genesis, design, and initial findings.
    Ulrich EM; Sobus JR; Grulke CM; Richard AM; Newton SR; Strynar MJ; Mansouri K; Williams AJ
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2019 Feb; 411(4):853-866. PubMed ID: 30519961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An approach to identifying specialized batteries of bioassays for specific classes of chemicals: class analysis using mutagenicity and carcinogenicity relationships and phylogenetic concordance and discordance patterns. 1. Composition and analysis of the overall data base. A report of phase II of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.
    Ray VA; Kier LD; Kannan KL; Haas RT; Auletta AE; Wassom JS; Nesnow S; Waters MD
    Mutat Res; 1987 May; 185(3):197-241. PubMed ID: 3574331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A procedure to detect and identify specific chemicals of potential inhalation toxicity concern in aerosols.
    Klupinski TP; Moyer RA; Chen PA; Strozier ED; Buehler SS; Friedenberg DA; Koszowski B
    Inhal Toxicol; 2022; 34(5-6):120-134. PubMed ID: 35344465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of QSARs and VFARs to the rapid risk assessment process at US EPA.
    Moudgal CJ; Young D; Nichols T; Martin T; Harten P; Venkatapathy R; Stelma G; Siddhanti S; Baier-Anderson C; Wolfe M
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(5-6):579-87. PubMed ID: 18853303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Integrating tools for non-targeted analysis research and chemical safety evaluations at the US EPA.
    Sobus JR; Wambaugh JF; Isaacs KK; Williams AJ; McEachran AD; Richard AM; Grulke CM; Ulrich EM; Rager JE; Strynar MJ; Newton SR
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):411-426. PubMed ID: 29288256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantifying the benefits of using read-across and in silico techniques to fulfill hazard data requirements for chemical categories.
    Stanton K; Kruszewski FH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Nov; 81():250-259. PubMed ID: 27612993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conditional Toxicity Value (CTV) Predictor: An
    Wignall JA; Muratov E; Sedykh A; Guyton KZ; Tropsha A; Rusyn I; Chiu WA
    Environ Health Perspect; 2018 May; 126(5):057008. PubMed ID: 29847084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.