BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33481633)

  • 1. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration versus standard fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Mohan BP; Crinò SF; Ofosu A; Ramai D; Lisotti A; Chandan S; Fusaroli P
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jul; 15(7):821-828. PubMed ID: 33481633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Standard Fine-Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Masses: A Propensity Score Analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Cotsoglou C; Chierici A; Mare R; Crinò SF; Muscatiello N
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 33036222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast-enhanced harmonic versus standard endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions: a single-center prospective randomized trial.
    Seicean A; Samarghitan A; Bolboacă SD; Pojoga C; Rusu I; Rusu D; Sparchez Z; Gheorghiu M; Al Hajjar N; Seicean R
    Endoscopy; 2020 Dec; 52(12):1084-1090. PubMed ID: 32650346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The usefulness of EUS-FNA with contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective study.
    Itonaga M; Kitano M; Kojima F; Hatamaru K; Yamashita Y; Tamura T; Nuta J; Kawaji Y; Shimokawa T; Tanioka K; Murata SI
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Dec; 35(12):2273-2280. PubMed ID: 32529685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Harmonic Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasonography for the Guidance of Fine-Needle Aspiration in Solid Pancreatic Masses.
    Seicean A; Badea R; Moldovan-Pop A; Vultur S; Botan EC; Zaharie T; Săftoiu A; Mocan T; Iancu C; Graur F; Sparchez Z; Seicean R
    Ultraschall Med; 2017 Apr; 38(2):174-182. PubMed ID: 26274382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.
    Minaga K; Yoshikawa T; Yamashita Y; Akamatsu H; Ikenouchi M; Ishii T; Matsumoto H; Iwagami H; Nakatani Y; Hatamaru K; Takenaka M; Akamatsu T; Uenoyama Y; Watanabe T; Ono K; Chiba Y; Kudo M
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2982-2991. PubMed ID: 31011943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct Comparison of Elastography Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration and B-Mode Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosing Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Gheorghiu M; Sparchez Z; Rusu I; Bolboacă SD; Seicean R; Pojoga C; Seicean A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fine needle biopsy is superior to fine needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound guided sampling of pancreatic masses: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Li H; Li W; Zhou QY; Fan B
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Mar; 97(13):e0207. PubMed ID: 29595661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Lesions in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Abdallah MA; Ahmed K; Taha W; Musa A; Reardon EE; Abdalla AO; Trikudanathan G
    Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Jun; 67(6):2552-2561. PubMed ID: 34086166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.
    Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Hamada T; Uchino R; Mizuno S; Miyabayashi K; Yamamoto K; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Hirano K; Tanaka M; Tada M; Fukayama M; Koike K
    Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24429514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) Using 22-gauge and 25-gauge Needles for Pancreatic Masses.
    Tian G; Bao H; Li J; Jiang T
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Nov; 24():8333-8341. PubMed ID: 30452433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass?: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Puli SR; Bechtold ML; Buxbaum JL; Eloubeidi MA
    Pancreas; 2013 Jan; 42(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 23254913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Gkolfakis P; Crinò SF; Tziatzios G; Ramai D; Papaefthymiou A; Papanikolaou IS; Triantafyllou K; Arvanitakis M; Lisotti A; Fusaroli P; Mangiavillano B; Carrara S; Repici A; Hassan C; Facciorusso A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Jun; 95(6):1067-1077.e15. PubMed ID: 35124072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang S; Ni M; Wang P; Zheng J; Sun Q; Xu G; Peng C; Shen S; Zhang W; Huang S; Wang L; Zou X; Lv Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 35614028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Puncture for the Patients with Pancreatic Masses.
    Otsuka Y; Kamata K; Kudo M
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.