These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33481633)

  • 1. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration versus standard fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Mohan BP; Crinò SF; Ofosu A; Ramai D; Lisotti A; Chandan S; Fusaroli P
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jul; 15(7):821-828. PubMed ID: 33481633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Standard Fine-Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Masses: A Propensity Score Analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Cotsoglou C; Chierici A; Mare R; Crinò SF; Muscatiello N
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 33036222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast-enhanced harmonic versus standard endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions: a single-center prospective randomized trial.
    Seicean A; Samarghitan A; Bolboacă SD; Pojoga C; Rusu I; Rusu D; Sparchez Z; Gheorghiu M; Al Hajjar N; Seicean R
    Endoscopy; 2020 Dec; 52(12):1084-1090. PubMed ID: 32650346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The usefulness of EUS-FNA with contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective study.
    Itonaga M; Kitano M; Kojima F; Hatamaru K; Yamashita Y; Tamura T; Nuta J; Kawaji Y; Shimokawa T; Tanioka K; Murata SI
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Dec; 35(12):2273-2280. PubMed ID: 32529685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Harmonic Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasonography for the Guidance of Fine-Needle Aspiration in Solid Pancreatic Masses.
    Seicean A; Badea R; Moldovan-Pop A; Vultur S; Botan EC; Zaharie T; Săftoiu A; Mocan T; Iancu C; Graur F; Sparchez Z; Seicean R
    Ultraschall Med; 2017 Apr; 38(2):174-182. PubMed ID: 26274382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.
    Minaga K; Yoshikawa T; Yamashita Y; Akamatsu H; Ikenouchi M; Ishii T; Matsumoto H; Iwagami H; Nakatani Y; Hatamaru K; Takenaka M; Akamatsu T; Uenoyama Y; Watanabe T; Ono K; Chiba Y; Kudo M
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2982-2991. PubMed ID: 31011943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct Comparison of Elastography Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration and B-Mode Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosing Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Gheorghiu M; Sparchez Z; Rusu I; Bolboacă SD; Seicean R; Pojoga C; Seicean A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fine needle biopsy is superior to fine needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound guided sampling of pancreatic masses: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Li H; Li W; Zhou QY; Fan B
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Mar; 97(13):e0207. PubMed ID: 29595661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Lesions in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Abdallah MA; Ahmed K; Taha W; Musa A; Reardon EE; Abdalla AO; Trikudanathan G
    Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Jun; 67(6):2552-2561. PubMed ID: 34086166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.
    Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Hamada T; Uchino R; Mizuno S; Miyabayashi K; Yamamoto K; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Hirano K; Tanaka M; Tada M; Fukayama M; Koike K
    Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24429514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) Using 22-gauge and 25-gauge Needles for Pancreatic Masses.
    Tian G; Bao H; Li J; Jiang T
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Nov; 24():8333-8341. PubMed ID: 30452433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass?: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Puli SR; Bechtold ML; Buxbaum JL; Eloubeidi MA
    Pancreas; 2013 Jan; 42(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 23254913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Gkolfakis P; Crinò SF; Tziatzios G; Ramai D; Papaefthymiou A; Papanikolaou IS; Triantafyllou K; Arvanitakis M; Lisotti A; Fusaroli P; Mangiavillano B; Carrara S; Repici A; Hassan C; Facciorusso A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Jun; 95(6):1067-1077.e15. PubMed ID: 35124072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang S; Ni M; Wang P; Zheng J; Sun Q; Xu G; Peng C; Shen S; Zhang W; Huang S; Wang L; Zou X; Lv Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 35614028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Puncture for the Patients with Pancreatic Masses.
    Otsuka Y; Kamata K; Kudo M
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.