272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33482909)
1. Diagnostic efficiency of whole-body
Steiner A; Narva S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Hietanen S; Hynninen J; Virtanen J
Cancer Imaging; 2021 Jan; 21(1):16. PubMed ID: 33482909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parameters of simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI predict tumor stage and several histopathological features in uterine cervical cancer.
Surov A; Meyer HJ; Schob S; Höhn AK; Bremicker K; Exner M; Stumpp P; Purz S
Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(17):28285-28296. PubMed ID: 28423698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrated PET/MRI for whole-body staging of patients with primary cervical cancer: preliminary results.
Grueneisen J; Schaarschmidt BM; Heubner M; Aktas B; Kinner S; Forsting M; Lauenstein T; Ruhlmann V; Umutlu L
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Nov; 42(12):1814-24. PubMed ID: 26199113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of
Sarabhai T; Schaarschmidt BM; Wetter A; Kirchner J; Aktas B; Forsting M; Ruhlmann V; Herrmann K; Umutlu L; Grueneisen J
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jan; 45(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 28840302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of whole-body FDG-PET in preoperative assessment of tumor staging in oral cancers.
Nakasone Y; Inoue T; Oriuchi N; Takeuchi K; Negishi A; Endo K; Mogi K
Ann Nucl Med; 2001 Dec; 15(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 11831398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ratio of Lymph Node to Primary Tumor SUV on PET/CT Accurately Predicts Nodal Malignancy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Mattes MD; Moshchinsky AB; Ahsanuddin S; Rizk NP; Foster A; Wu AJ; Ashamalla H; Weber WA; Rimner A
Clin Lung Cancer; 2015 Nov; 16(6):e253-8. PubMed ID: 26163919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FDG PET-CT in cervical cancer: relationship between primary tumor FDG uptake and metastatic potential.
Yilmaz M; Adli M; Celen Z; Zincirkeser S; Dirier A
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jun; 31(6):526-31. PubMed ID: 20215979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging.
Heusner TA; Kuemmel S; Koeninger A; Hamami ME; Hahn S; Quinsten A; Bockisch A; Forsting M; Lauenstein T; Antoch G; Stahl A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Jun; 37(6):1077-86. PubMed ID: 20204355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in lymph node metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI.
Schaarschmidt BM; Buchbender C; Nensa F; Grueneisen J; Gomez B; Köhler J; Reis H; Ruhlmann V; Umutlu L; Heusch P
PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0116277. PubMed ID: 25574968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High standardized uptake values of
Yang Z; Wu JR; Wei LL; Liao GX; Yang CJ; Jin GQ; Xiao GY; Su DK
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 31273350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous [18F]FDG-PET/MRI: Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) in Primary and Recurrent Cervical Cancer.
Brandmaier P; Purz S; Bremicker K; Höckel M; Barthel H; Kluge R; Kahn T; Sabri O; Stumpp P
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141684. PubMed ID: 26551527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficients measured by 3T diffusion-weighted MRI and SUV from FDG PET/CT in primary cervical cancer.
Ho KC; Lin G; Wang JJ; Lai CH; Chang CJ; Yen TC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2009 Feb; 36(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 18779960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient with simultaneous MR/positron emission tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: comparison with 18F-FDG-PET.
Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H; Gatidis S; Brendle C; Müller M; Königsrainer I; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg AC; Schraml C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1121-8. PubMed ID: 24923481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Accuracy of FEC-PET/CT, FDG-PET/CT, and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Detection of Nodal Metastases in Surgically Treated Endometrial and Cervical Carcinoma.
Rockall AG; Barwick TD; Wilson W; Singh N; Bharwani N; Sohaib A; Nobbenhuis M; Warbey V; Miquel M; Koh DM; De Paepe KN; Martin-Hirsch P; Ghaem-Maghami S; Fotopoulou C; Stringfellow H; Sundar S; Manchanda R; Sahdev A; Hackshaw A; Cook GJ;
Clin Cancer Res; 2021 Dec; 27(23):6457-6466. PubMed ID: 34526364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical Cancer: Associations between Metabolic Parameters and Whole Lesion Histogram Analysis Derived from Simultaneous
Meyer HJ; Purz S; Sabri O; Surov A
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():5063285. PubMed ID: 30154687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined pre-treatment MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters as prognostic biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer.
Miccò M; Vargas HA; Burger IA; Kollmeier MA; Goldman DA; Park KJ; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Sala E
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1169-1176. PubMed ID: 24767630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hybrid [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/MRI including non-Gaussian diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): preliminary results in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Heusch P; Köhler J; Wittsack HJ; Heusner TA; Buchbender C; Poeppel TD; Nensa F; Wetter A; Gauler T; Hartung V; Lanzman RS
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2055-60. PubMed ID: 23830904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective evaluation of whole-body MRI and
Bruckmann NM; Sawicki LM; Kirchner J; Martin O; Umutlu L; Herrmann K; Fendler W; Bittner AK; Hoffmann O; Mohrmann S; Dietzel F; Ingenwerth M; Schaarschmidt BM; Li Y; Kowall B; Stang A; Antoch G; Buchbender C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Nov; 47(12):2816-2825. PubMed ID: 32333068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of tumor histology on detection of pelvic and para-aortic nodal metastasis with
Lin AJ; Wright JD; Dehdashti F; Siegel BA; Markovina S; Schwarz J; Thaker PH; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Grigsby PW
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Nov; 29(9):1351-1354. PubMed ID: 31473660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
