These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3348349)
1. Reliabilities of alternate measures of contrast sensitivity functions. Long GM; Tuck JP Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Jan; 65(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 3348349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of the Vistech Contrast Test System in a life-span adult sample. Scialfa CT; Adams EM; Giovanetto M Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Apr; 68(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 2052282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for static and flickered gratings in a college sample. Long GM; May PA Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Dec; 69(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 1300512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the rate of contrast change on the quality of contrast sensitivity assessment: a comparison of three psychophysical methods. Nio YK; Jansonius NM; Lamers P; Mager A; Zeinstra J; Kooijman AC Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jan; 25(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 15649179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast sensitivity determined with the spatial bandwidth equalization technique: threshold, suprathreshold, and spatiotemporal measurements. Wiley RW; Harding TH; Gribler MG; Kirby AW Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Apr; 61(4):221-31. PubMed ID: 6731570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements. Thurman SM; Davey PG; McCray KL; Paronian V; Seitz AR J Vis; 2016 Dec; 16(15):15. PubMed ID: 28006065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceived flicker rate of suprathreshold stimuli: influences of spatial-frequency content and modulation amplitude. Bowker DO J Opt Soc Am; 1982 Dec; 72(12):1652-9. PubMed ID: 7153806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast sensitivity norms for the Mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester. Corwin TR; Carlson NB; Berger E Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Dec; 66(12):864-70. PubMed ID: 2626254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Normative contrast sensitivity functions: the problem of comparison. Long GM; Penn DL Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Feb; 64(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 3826287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of techniques for measuring contrast sensitivity in children. Brown VA; Woodhouse JM Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 3748562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a clinical glare test based on estimation of intraocular light scatter. Beckman C; Abrahamsson M; Sjöstrand J; Hård S Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Nov; 68(11):881-7. PubMed ID: 1766651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discrimination of wide-field images as a test of a peripheral-vision model. Peli E; Geri GA J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Feb; 18(2):294-301. PubMed ID: 11205974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Slight variations of vitamin A in blood levels and their effect on visual perception]. Meyer JJ; Bousquet A; Korol S; Brubacher G Soz Praventivmed; 1981 Oct; 26(5):310-2. PubMed ID: 7314933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relation between visual acuity and other spatial vision measures. Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Schneck ME; Lott LA; Brabyn JA Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Dec; 77(12):653-62. PubMed ID: 11147735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-criterion threshold techniques: evidence for separate spatial and temporal mechanisms? Panish SC; Swift DJ; Smith RA Vision Res; 1983; 23(12):1519-25. PubMed ID: 6666053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normal and amblyopic contrast sensitivity function in central and peripheral retinas. Thomas J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1978 Aug; 17(8):746-53. PubMed ID: 681134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychophysical tests of vision and hearing in patients with multiple sclerosis. Regan D Adv Neurol; 1981; 31():217-37. PubMed ID: 7325044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. Simpson TL; Regan D Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 72(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7731649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal factors in visual perception: a differential approach. Jones MB; Kennedy RS Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):859-67. PubMed ID: 8668444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting visual acuity from detection thresholds. Newacheck JS; Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Adams AJ Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 67(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 2320362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]