BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33483630)

  • 1. Comparison of body composition assessment across body mass index categories by two multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis devices and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in clinical settings.
    Lahav Y; Goldstein N; Gepner Y
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2021 Aug; 75(8):1275-1282. PubMed ID: 33483630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obese Colombian adults.
    Ramírez-Vélez R; Tordecilla-Sanders A; Correa-Bautista JE; González-Ruíz K; González-Jiménez E; Triana-Reina HR; García-Hermoso A; Schmidt-RioValle J
    Am J Hum Biol; 2018 Jan; 30(1):. PubMed ID: 28987018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, Slaughter Skinfold-Thickness Equations, and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Estimating Body Fat Percentage in Colombian Children and Adolescents with Excess of Adiposity.
    González-Ruíz K; Medrano M; Correa-Bautista JE; García-Hermoso A; Prieto-Benavides DH; Tordecilla-Sanders A; Agostinis-Sobrinho C; Correa-Rodríguez M; Schmidt Rio-Valle J; González-Jiménez E; Ramírez-Vélez R
    Nutrients; 2018 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 30110944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of two portable bioelectrical impedance analyses for the assessment of body composition in school age children.
    Lee LW; Liao YS; Lu HK; Hsiao PL; Chen YY; Chi CC; Hsieh KC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171568. PubMed ID: 28158304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in the Assessment of Body Composition in Women with Anorexia Nervosa upon Admission and Discharge from an Inpatient Specialist Unit.
    Abbaspour A; Reed KK; Hübel C; Bulik-Sullivan EC; Tang Q; Bulik CM; Carroll IM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34769915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement Between 2 Segmental Bioimpedance Devices, BOD POD, and DXA in Obese Adults.
    Nickerson BS; McLester CN; McLester JR; Kliszczewicz BM
    J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(1):138-148. PubMed ID: 31122829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Comparison of Segmental Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Estimating Fat Free Mass and Percentage Body Fat in an Ambulatory Population.
    Hurt RT; Ebbert JO; Croghan I; Nanda S; Schroeder DR; Teigen LM; Velapati SR; Mundi MS
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2021 Aug; 45(6):1231-1238. PubMed ID: 32794583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of a Bioelectrical Impedance Device against the Reference Method Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Anthropometry for the Evaluation of Body Composition in Adults.
    Day K; Kwok A; Evans A; Mata F; Verdejo-Garcia A; Hart K; Ward LC; Truby H
    Nutrients; 2018 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 30308974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Body composition analysis by leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in non-obese and obese individuals.
    Boneva-Asiova Z; Boyanov MA
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2008 Nov; 10(11):1012-8. PubMed ID: 18435776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation study of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry among obese patients.
    Faria SL; Faria OP; Cardeal MD; Ito MK
    Obes Surg; 2014 Sep; 24(9):1476-80. PubMed ID: 24464546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-calibration of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with eight-point tactile electrodes and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in healthy children aged 6-18 years.
    Lim JS; Hwang JS; Lee JA; Kim DH; Park KD; Jeong JS; Cheon GJ
    Pediatr Int; 2009 Apr; 51(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 19405930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and Agreement of Various InBody Body Composition Analyzers as Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Healthy Men and Women.
    McLester CN; Nickerson BS; Kliszczewicz BM; McLester JR
    J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(3):443-450. PubMed ID: 30472111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of segmental multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition of adults across a range of body mass indexes.
    Shafer KJ; Siders WA; Johnson LK; Lukaski HC
    Nutrition; 2009 Jan; 25(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18723322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of percentage body fat in a large, healthy population.
    Sun G; French CR; Martin GR; Younghusband B; Green RC; Xie YG; Mathews M; Barron JR; Fitzpatrick DG; Gulliver W; Zhang H
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2005 Jan; 81(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 15640463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Similarities and discrepancies between commercially available bioelectrical impedance analysis system and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in 10-14-year-old children.
    Ohara K; Nakamura H; Kouda K; Fujita Y; Mase T; Momoi K; Nishiyama T
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17420. PubMed ID: 37833453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of total and segmental body composition using DXA and multifrequency bioimpedance in collegiate female athletes.
    Esco MR; Snarr RL; Leatherwood MD; Chamberlain NA; Redding ML; Flatt AA; Moon JR; Williford HN
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Apr; 29(4):918-25. PubMed ID: 25353076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparative analysis of body composition assessment methods in healthy men and in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry].
    Freitas Júnior IF; Rupp de Paiva SA; de Godoy I; Smaili Santos SM; Campana AO
    Arch Latinoam Nutr; 2005 Jun; 55(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 16335221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimations of body fat by anthropometry or bioelectrical impedance differ from those by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in prefrail community-dwelling older women.
    da Silva JSM; Biesek S; Vojciechowski AS; Borba VZC; Rabito EI; Gomes ARS; Oliveira LA
    Nutr Res; 2021 Feb; 86():1-9. PubMed ID: 33444993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of Four Commercial Bioelectrical Impedance Scales in Measuring Body Fat among Chinese Children and Adolescents.
    Wang L; Hui SS
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():614858. PubMed ID: 26167491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Body Mass Index, Skinfold Thickness, and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis With Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Hemodialysis Patients.
    de Abreu AM; Wilvert LC; Wazlawik E
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2020 Dec; 35(6):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 32141138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.