178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33483951)
1. Comparing semi-landmarking approaches for analyzing three-dimensional cranial morphology.
Rolfe S; Davis C; Maga AM
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2021 May; 175(1):227-237. PubMed ID: 33483951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.
Percival CJ; Devine J; Darwin BC; Liu W; van Eede M; Henkelman RM; Hallgrimsson B
J Anat; 2019 Jun; 234(6):917-935. PubMed ID: 30901082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Study on the method of automatically determining maxillary complex landmarks based on non-rigid registration algorithms].
Gao ZX; Wang J; Wen AN; Zhu YJ; Qin QZ; Wang Y; Zhao YJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 58(6):554-560. PubMed ID: 37272000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A semi-supervised learning approach for automated 3D cephalometric landmark identification using computed tomography.
Yun HS; Hyun CM; Baek SH; Lee SH; Seo JK
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275114. PubMed ID: 36170279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic landmarking as a convenient prerequisite for geometric morphometrics. Validation on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)- based shape analysis of the nasal complex.
Ridel AF; Demeter F; Galland M; L'abbé EN; Vandermeulen D; Oettlé AC
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110095. PubMed ID: 31841934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Automatic 3D Facial Landmarking Algorithm Using 2D Gabor Wavelets.
de Jong MA; Wollstein A; Ruff C; Dunaway D; Hysi P; Spector T; Fan Liu ; Niessen W; Koudstaal MJ; Kayser M; Wolvius EB; Bohringer S
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Feb; 25(2):580-8. PubMed ID: 26540684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-Density Morphometric Analysis of Shape and Integration: The Good, the Bad, and the Not-Really-a-Problem.
Goswami A; Watanabe A; Felice RN; Bardua C; Fabre AC; Polly PD
Integr Comp Biol; 2019 Sep; 59(3):669-683. PubMed ID: 31243431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Three-Dimensional Statistical Average Skull: Application of Biometric Morphing in Generating Missing Anatomy.
Teshima TL; Patel V; Mainprize JG; Edwards G; Antonyshyn OM
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 26(5):1634-8. PubMed ID: 26114514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel approach to craniofacial analysis using automated 3D landmarking of the skull.
Wilke F; Matthews H; Herrick N; Dopkins N; Claes P; Walsh S
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12381. PubMed ID: 38811771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fully automated landmarking and facial segmentation on 3D photographs.
Berends B; Bielevelt F; Schreurs R; Vinayahalingam S; Maal T; de Jong G
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6463. PubMed ID: 38499700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic landmark annotation in 3D surface scans of skulls: Methodological proposal and reliability study.
Bermejo E; Taniguchi K; Ogawa Y; Martos R; Valsecchi A; Mesejo P; Ibáñez O; Imaizumi K
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Oct; 210():106380. PubMed ID: 34478914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CraMs: Craniometric Analysis Application Using 3D Skull Models.
Dias P; Neves L; Santos D; Coelho C; Ferreira MT; Santos H; Silva S; Santos BS
IEEE Comput Graph Appl; 2015; 35(6):11-7. PubMed ID: 26594956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Resolution and Texture of Laser Scanning Generated Three-Dimensional Models on Landmark Identification.
Toneva D; Nikolova S; Georgiev I; Lazarov N
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2020 Jul; 303(7):1950-1965. PubMed ID: 31577844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Automatic determination of mandibular landmarks based on three-dimensional mandibular average model].
Gao ZX; Wang Y; Wen AN; Zhu YJ; Qin QZ; Zhang Y; Wang J; Zhao YJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Feb; 55(1):174-180. PubMed ID: 36718708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning-based local-to-global landmark annotation for automatic 3D cephalometry.
Yun HS; Jang TJ; Lee SM; Lee SH; Seo JK
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 65(8):085018. PubMed ID: 32101805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Virtual reconstruction of modern and fossil hominoid crania: consequences of reference sample choice.
Senck S; Bookstein FL; Benazzi S; Kastner J; Weber GW
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2015 May; 298(5):827-41. PubMed ID: 25689596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hybrid approach for automatic cephalometric landmark annotation on cone-beam computed tomography volumes.
Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jul; 154(1):140-150. PubMed ID: 29957312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic 3-dimensional cephalometric landmarking based on active shape models in related projections.
Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Mar; 153(3):449-458. PubMed ID: 29501121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fully Automatic Landmarking of Syndromic 3D Facial Surface Scans Using 2D Images.
Bannister JJ; Crites SR; Aponte JD; Katz DC; Wilms M; Klein OD; Bernier FPJ; Spritz RA; Hallgrímsson B; Forkert ND
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 32503190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
