211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33484125)
1. Reflection on modern methods: causal inference considerations for heterogeneous disease etiology.
Nevo D; Ogino S; Wang M
Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 50(3):1030-1037. PubMed ID: 33484125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Causal Diagrams: Pitfalls and Tips.
Suzuki E; Shinozaki T; Yamamoto E
J Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):153-162. PubMed ID: 32009103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Interrogating Bias: Reflections on Hernán et al. 20 Years Later.
Levy NS; Keyes KM
Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Nov; 192(11):1797-1800. PubMed ID: 34791035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Causal directed acyclic graphs and the direction of unmeasured confounding bias.
VanderWeele TJ; Hernán MA; Robins JM
Epidemiology; 2008 Sep; 19(5):720-8. PubMed ID: 18633331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reflection on modern methods: building causal evidence within high-dimensional molecular epidemiological studies of moderate size.
Ponsonby AL
Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 50(3):1016-1029. PubMed ID: 33594409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Directed Acyclic Graphs in Surgical Research.
Gongola A; Bradshaw JC
J Surg Res; 2023 Feb; 282():285-288. PubMed ID: 36045022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs.
Shrier I; Platt RW
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Oct; 8():70. PubMed ID: 18973665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Avoiding overadjustment bias in social epidemiology through appropriate covariate selection: a primer.
van Zwieten A; Tennant PWG; Kelly-Irving M; Blyth FM; Teixeira-Pinto A; Khalatbari-Soltani S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Sep; 149():127-136. PubMed ID: 35662623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Application of directed acyclic graphs in identifying and controlling confounding bias].
Liu HX; Wang HB; Wang N
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 41(4):585-588. PubMed ID: 32344486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Causal Diagram Techniques for Urologic Oncology Research.
Shapiro DD; Msaouel P
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Jun; 19(3):271.e1-271.e7. PubMed ID: 32893127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reflection on modern methods: understanding bias and data analytical strategies through DAG-based data simulations.
Duan C; Dragomir AD; Luta G; Breitling LP
Int J Epidemiol; 2022 Jan; 50(6):2091-2097. PubMed ID: 34999856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Illustrating How to Simulate Data From Directed Acyclic Graphs to Understand Epidemiologic Concepts.
Fox MP; Nianogo R; Rudolph JE; Howe CJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Jun; 191(7):1300-1306. PubMed ID: 35259232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "Toward a clearer definition of confounding" revisited with directed acyclic graphs.
Howards PP; Schisterman EF; Poole C; Kaufman JS; Weinberg CR
Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 176(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 22904203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using Directed Acyclic Graphs to detect limitations of traditional regression in longitudinal studies.
Moodie EE; Stephens DA
Int J Public Health; 2010 Dec; 55(6):701-3. PubMed ID: 20838848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Causal Inference in Medicine Part II. Directed acyclic graphs--a useful method for confounder selection, categorization of potential biases, and hypothesis specification].
Suzuki E; Komatsu H; Yorifuji T; Yamamoto E; Doi H; Tsuda T
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2009 Sep; 64(4):796-805. PubMed ID: 19797848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limitations of individual causal models, causal graphs, and ignorability assumptions, as illustrated by random confounding and design unfaithfulness.
Greenland S; Mansournia MA
Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1101-10. PubMed ID: 25687168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A counterfactual approach to bias and effect modification in terms of response types.
Suzuki E; Mitsuhashi T; Tsuda T; Yamamoto E
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jul; 13():101. PubMed ID: 23902658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of inverse probability weighting in molecular pathological epidemiology.
Liu L; Nevo D; Nishihara R; Cao Y; Song M; Twombly TS; Chan AT; Giovannucci EL; VanderWeele TJ; Wang M; Ogino S
Eur J Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 33(4):381-392. PubMed ID: 29264788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bounding Bias Due to Selection.
Smith LH; VanderWeele TJ
Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):509-516. PubMed ID: 31033690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biases in Randomized Trials: A Conversation Between Trialists and Epidemiologists.
Mansournia MA; Higgins JP; Sterne JA; Hernán MA
Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 27748683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
