These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33484125)

  • 21. Negative control exposure studies in the presence of measurement error: implications for attempted effect estimate calibration.
    Sanderson E; Macdonald-Wallis C; Davey Smith G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 47(2):587-596. PubMed ID: 29088358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify confounders in applied health research: review and recommendations.
    Tennant PWG; Murray EJ; Arnold KF; Berrie L; Fox MP; Gadd SC; Harrison WJ; Keeble C; Ranker LR; Textor J; Tomova GD; Gilthorpe MS; Ellison GTH
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 May; 50(2):620-632. PubMed ID: 33330936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Causal inference for clinicians.
    Stovitz SD; Shrier I
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2019 Jun; 24(3):109-112. PubMed ID: 30765385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation.
    Genbäck M; de Luna X
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):506-515. PubMed ID: 30430543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tutorial on directed acyclic graphs.
    Digitale JC; Martin JN; Glymour MM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Feb; 142():264-267. PubMed ID: 34371103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using compartmental models to simulate directed acyclic graphs to explore competing causal mechanisms underlying epidemiological study data.
    Havumaki J; Eisenberg MC
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Jun; 17(167):20190675. PubMed ID: 32574536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.
    Yu Y; Li H; Sun X; Su P; Wang T; Liu Y; Yuan Z; Liu Y; Xue F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):177. PubMed ID: 29281984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 15(3):436-40. PubMed ID: 19366394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predictive models aren't for causal inference.
    Arif S; MacNeil MA
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Aug; 25(8):1741-1745. PubMed ID: 35672133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Limits for the Magnitude of M-bias and Certain Other Types of Structural Selection Bias.
    Flanders WD; Ye D
    Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):501-508. PubMed ID: 31033689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Causal analysis approaches in epidemiology].
    Dumas O; Siroux V; Le Moual N; Varraso R
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2014 Feb; 62(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 24388738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The control outcome calibration approach for causal inference with unobserved confounding.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 179(5):633-40. PubMed ID: 24363326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Directed Acyclic Graphs for Oral Disease Research.
    Akinkugbe AA; Sharma S; Ohrbach R; Slade GD; Poole C
    J Dent Res; 2016 Jul; 95(8):853-9. PubMed ID: 27000052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selection Bias When Estimating Average Treatment Effects Using One-sample Instrumental Variable Analysis.
    Hughes RA; Davies NM; Davey Smith G; Tilling K
    Epidemiology; 2019 May; 30(3):350-357. PubMed ID: 30896457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package 'dagitty'.
    Textor J; van der Zander B; Gilthorpe MS; Liskiewicz M; Ellison GT
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1887-1894. PubMed ID: 28089956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Application of directed acyclic graphs in control of confounding].
    Xiang R; Dai WJ; Xiong Y; Wu X; Yang YF; Wang L; Dai ZH; Li J; Liu AZ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1035-8. PubMed ID: 27453119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A biologist's guide to model selection and causal inference.
    Laubach ZM; Murray EJ; Hoke KL; Safran RJ; Perng W
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jan; 288(1943):20202815. PubMed ID: 33499782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Summary of relationships between exchangeability, biasing paths and bias.
    Flanders WD; Eldridge RC
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1089-99. PubMed ID: 24894825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Errors in causal inference: an organizational schema for systematic error and random error.
    Suzuki E; Tsuda T; Mitsuhashi T; Mansournia MA; Yamamoto E
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):788-793.e1. PubMed ID: 27771142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bayesian identification of structural coefficients in causal models and the causal false-positive risk of confounders and colliders in linear Markovian models.
    Kelter R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):58. PubMed ID: 35220960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.