These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33484125)

  • 41. Summary of relationships between exchangeability, biasing paths and bias.
    Flanders WD; Eldridge RC
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1089-99. PubMed ID: 24894825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Errors in causal inference: an organizational schema for systematic error and random error.
    Suzuki E; Tsuda T; Mitsuhashi T; Mansournia MA; Yamamoto E
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):788-793.e1. PubMed ID: 27771142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bayesian identification of structural coefficients in causal models and the causal false-positive risk of confounders and colliders in linear Markovian models.
    Kelter R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):58. PubMed ID: 35220960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Adjusting for indirectly measured confounding using large-scale propensity score.
    Zhang L; Wang Y; Schuemie MJ; Blei DM; Hripcsak G
    J Biomed Inform; 2022 Oct; 134():104204. PubMed ID: 36108816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Accounting for uncertainty in confounder and effect modifier selection when estimating average causal effects in generalized linear models.
    Wang C; Dominici F; Parmigiani G; Zigler CM
    Biometrics; 2015 Sep; 71(3):654-65. PubMed ID: 25899155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Causal simulation experiments: Lessons from bias amplification.
    Stokes T; Steele R; Shrier I
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Jan; 31(1):3-46. PubMed ID: 34812681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Adjustment for energy intake in nutritional research: a causal inference perspective.
    Tomova GD; Arnold KF; Gilthorpe MS; Tennant PWG
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2022 Jan; 115(1):189-198. PubMed ID: 34313676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Educational Note: Paradoxical collider effect in the analysis of non-communicable disease epidemiological data: a reproducible illustration and web application.
    Luque-Fernandez MA; Schomaker M; Redondo-Sanchez D; Jose Sanchez Perez M; Vaidya A; Schnitzer ME
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 48(2):640-653. PubMed ID: 30561628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Exploring Selection Bias by Causal Frailty Models: The Magnitude Matters.
    Stensrud MJ; Valberg M; Røysland K; Aalen OO
    Epidemiology; 2017 May; 28(3):379-386. PubMed ID: 28244888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Model Averaging for Improving Inference from Causal Diagrams.
    Hamra GB; Kaufman JS; Vahratian A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Aug; 12(8):9391-407. PubMed ID: 26270672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Causal inference in cumulative risk assessment: The roles of directed acyclic graphs.
    Brewer LE; Wright JM; Rice G; Neas L; Teuschler L
    Environ Int; 2017 May; 102():30-41. PubMed ID: 27988137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Bias and causal associations in observational research.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Measured and accounted-for confounding in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: Some thoughts for practitioners.
    Roy J; Mitra N
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2021 Mar; 30(3):277-282. PubMed ID: 33372303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. How to implement directed acyclic graphs to reduce bias in addiction research.
    Wouk K; Bauer AE; Gottfredson NC
    Addict Behav; 2019 Jul; 94():109-116. PubMed ID: 30292573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Compound treatments and transportability of causal inference.
    Hernán MA; VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2011 May; 22(3):368-77. PubMed ID: 21399502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Invited Commentary: Beware the Test-Negative Design.
    Westreich D; Hudgens MG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 184(5):354-6. PubMed ID: 27587722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Matching in observational research: from the directed acyclic graph perspective].
    Luo T; Wang L; Tian T; Fu WH; Pei HL; Zheng YJ; Dai JH
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 42(4):740-744. PubMed ID: 34814461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. From bad to worse: collider stratification amplifies confounding bias in the "obesity paradox".
    Banack HR; Kaufman JS
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1111-4. PubMed ID: 26187718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Bias in Clinical Research.
    Stuckless S; Parfrey PS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():17-34. PubMed ID: 33871836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs): an aid to assess confounding in dental research.
    Merchant AT; Pitiphat W
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2002 Dec; 30(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 12453109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.