BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33484900)

  • 1. [Para-aortic lymph node staging in grade IB2 and above cervical cancers: Comparison of 18FDG PET-CT with para-aortic lymphadenectomy, using data from the Côte d'Or gynaecological cancer registry from 2003 to 2016].
    Carré A; Sellier J; Kamga AM; Dabakuyo S; Rouffiac M; Coutant C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2021 Sep; 49(9):677-683. PubMed ID: 33484900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
    Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interest of para-aortic lymphadenectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET scanning.
    Khebbeb S; Rathat G; Serrand C; Bourdon A; Ferrer C; Duraes M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 May; 272():234-239. PubMed ID: 35397374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. False negative rate at
    Gouy S; Seebacher V; Chargari C; Terroir M; Grimaldi S; Ilenko A; Maulard A; Genestie C; Leary A; Pautier P; Morice P; Deandreis D
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):135. PubMed ID: 33549033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
    Leblanc E; Gauthier H; Querleu D; Ferron G; Zerdoud S; Morice P; Uzan C; Lumbroso S; Lecuru F; Bats AS; Ghazzar N; Bannier M; Houvenaeghel G; Brenot-Rossi I; Narducci F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):2302-9. PubMed ID: 21347790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survival effect of laparoscopic para-aortic staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis.
    Pomel C; Martinez A; Bourgin C; Beguinot M; Benoit C; Naik R; Dauplat J; Lebouedec G; Ferron G
    BJOG; 2017 Jun; 124(7):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 28128517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Added value of para-aortic surgical staging compared to
    De Cuypere M; Lovinfosse P; Goffin F; Gennigens C; Rovira R; Duch J; Fastrez M; Gebhart G; Squifflet JL; Luyckx M; Charaf G; Crener K; Buxant F; Bucella D; Jouret M; Hustinx R; Kridelka F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 46(5):883-887. PubMed ID: 31784203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus para-aortic lymphadenectomy alone for locally advanced FIGO stage IB2 to IIB cervical cancer using a propensity score matching analysis: Results from the FRANCOGYN study group.
    Bendifallah S; de Foucher T; Ouldamer L; Bricou A; Lavoue V; Varinot J; Canlorbe G; Carcopino X; Raimond E; Huguet F; Graesslin O; Touboul C; Collinet P; Huchon C; Daraï E; Ballester M;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1921-1928. PubMed ID: 30213717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Histologic results of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients treated for stage IB2/II cervical cancer with negative [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans in the para-aortic area.
    Boughanim M; Leboulleux S; Rey A; Pham CT; Zafrani Y; Duvillard P; Lumbroso J; Haie-Meder C; Schlumberger M; Morice P
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(15):2558-61. PubMed ID: 18487573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of morbidity and clinical implications of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in a continuous series of 98 patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer and negative PET-CT imaging in the para-aortic area.
    Uzan C; Souadka A; Gouy S; Debaere T; Duclos J; Lumbroso J; Haie-Meder C; Morice P
    Oncologist; 2011; 16(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 21659610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tumour and pelvic lymph node metabolic activity on FDG-PET/CT to stratify patients for para-aortic surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Martinez A; Voglimacci M; Lusque A; Ducassou A; Gladieff L; Dupuis N; Angeles MA; Martinez C; Tanguy Le Gac Y; Chantalat E; Hitzel A; Courbon F; Ferron G; Gabiache E
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1252-1260. PubMed ID: 31915897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Brockbank E; Kokka F; Bryant A; Pomel C; Reynolds K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD008217. PubMed ID: 23543561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Para-aortic lymph node metastases in locally advanced cervical cancer: Comparison between surgical staging and imaging.
    Vandeperre A; Van Limbergen E; Leunen K; Moerman P; Amant F; Vergote I
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 26007204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-center experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
    Fastrez M; Goffin F; Vergote I; Vandromme J; Petit P; Leunen K; Degueldre M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Aug; 92(8):895-901. PubMed ID: 23590725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Brockbank E; Kokka F; Bryant A; Pomel C; Reynolds K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Apr; (4):CD008217. PubMed ID: 21491407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced cervical cancer: morbidity and impact on therapy].
    Souadka A; Gouy S; Debaere T; Duclos J; Lumbroso J; Haie-Meder C; Morice P; Uzan C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 22361464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
    Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic Impact of Pretreatment Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography SUVmax in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.
    Cima S; Perrone AM; Castellucci P; Macchia G; Buwenge M; Cammelli S; Cilla S; Ferioli M; Ferrandina G; Galuppi A; Salizzoni E; Rubino D; Fanti S; De Iaco P; Morganti AG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Mar; 28(3):575-580. PubMed ID: 29372911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis by positron emission tomography of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in advanced cervical cancer with negative magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Yeh LS; Hung YC; Shen YY; Kao CH; Lin CC; Lee CC
    Oncol Rep; 2002; 9(6):1289-92. PubMed ID: 12375036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings.
    Ramirez PT; Jhingran A; Macapinlac HA; Euscher ED; Munsell MF; Coleman RL; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; Frumovitz M; Ramondetta LM
    Cancer; 2011 May; 117(9):1928-34. PubMed ID: 21509770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.