These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33485217)

  • 1. Challenges in user-driven optimization of EHR: A case study of a large Epic implementation in Denmark.
    Bansler JP
    Int J Med Inform; 2021 Apr; 148():104394. PubMed ID: 33485217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals.
    Høstgaard AMB; Bertelsen P; Nøhr C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Apr; 17(1):45. PubMed ID: 28427407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors.
    Bossen C; Jensen LG; Udsen FW
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Oct; 82(10):940-53. PubMed ID: 23827768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bringing service design to the development of health information systems: The case of the Portuguese national electronic health record.
    Grenha Teixeira J; Pinho NF; Patrício L
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Dec; 132():103942. PubMed ID: 31627031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding optimization processes of electronic health records (EHR) in select leading hospitals: a qualitative study.
    Moon MC; Hills R; Demiris G
    J Innov Health Inform; 2018 Jun; 25(2):109-125. PubMed ID: 30398450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anything but engaged: user involvement in the context of a national electronic health record implementation.
    Cresswell K; Morrison Z; Crowe S; Robertson A; Sheikh A
    Inform Prim Care; 2011; 19(4):191-206. PubMed ID: 22828574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Staff expectations for the implementation of an electronic health record system: a qualitative study using normalisation process theory.
    McCrorie C; Benn J; Johnson OA; Scantlebury A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Nov; 19(1):222. PubMed ID: 31727063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining the acceptance of an integrated Electronic Health Records system: Insights from a repeated cross-sectional design.
    Luyten J; Marneffe W
    Int J Med Inform; 2021 Jun; 150():104450. PubMed ID: 33848941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based management of ambulatory electronic health record system implementation: an assessment of conceptual support and qualitative evidence.
    McAlearney AS; Hefner JL; Sieck C; Rizer M; Huerta TR
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jul; 83(7):484-94. PubMed ID: 24862893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large-Scale EHR Suites and Path-Dependence.
    Ellingsen G; Hertzum M; Christensen B; Wynn R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 Jun; 295():372-375. PubMed ID: 35773888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A mixed methods study of how clinician 'super users' influence others during the implementation of electronic health records.
    Yuan CT; Bradley EH; Nembhard IM
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Apr; 15():26. PubMed ID: 25889076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors.
    Nguyen L; Bellucci E; Nguyen LT
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Nov; 83(11):779-96. PubMed ID: 25085286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementing Large-Scale Electronic Health Records: Experiences from implementations of Epic in Denmark and Finland.
    Hertzum M; Ellingsen G; Cajander Å
    Int J Med Inform; 2022 Nov; 167():104868. PubMed ID: 36194994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The implementation of an electronic health record: Comparing preparations for Epic in Norway with experiences from the UK and Denmark.
    Hertzum M; Ellingsen G
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Sep; 129():312-317. PubMed ID: 31445272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization Sprints: Improving Clinician Satisfaction and Teamwork by Rapidly Reducing Electronic Health Record Burden.
    Sieja A; Markley K; Pell J; Gonzalez C; Redig B; Kneeland P; Lin CT
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2019 May; 94(5):793-802. PubMed ID: 30824281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Envisioning electronic health record systems as change management: the experience of an English hospital joining the National Programme for Information Technology.
    Takian A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():901-5. PubMed ID: 22874323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study.
    Murphy DR; Satterly T; Giardina TD; Sittig DF; Singh H
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1825-1832. PubMed ID: 31292905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Process for Managing and Optimizing Radiology Work Flow in the Electronic Heath Record Environment.
    Sachs PB; Long G
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 26296949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimization of Electronic Health Record Usability Through a Department-Led Quality Improvement Process.
    Franks AM; Clements C; Bannister T; Mays-Kingston A; Beaty A; Korkmaz A; Parker JA; Petrany SM
    Ann Fam Med; 2024 Mar; 22(2):81-88. PubMed ID: 38383045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.