120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33485512)
1. QCT-FE modeling of the proximal tibia: Effect of mapping strategy on convergence time and model accuracy.
Ashjaee N; Kalajahi SMH; Johnston JD
Med Eng Phys; 2021 Feb; 88():41-46. PubMed ID: 33485512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of local proximal tibial subchondral bone structural stiffness using subject-specific finite element modeling: Effect of selected density-modulus relationship.
Nazemi SM; Amini M; Kontulainen SA; Milner JS; Holdsworth DW; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Johnston JD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Aug; 30(7):703-12. PubMed ID: 26024555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An exclusion approach for addressing partial volume artifacts with quantititive computed tomography-based finite element modeling of the proximal tibia.
Kalajahi SMH; Nazemi SM; Johnston JD
Med Eng Phys; 2020 Feb; 76():95-100. PubMed ID: 31870545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimizing finite element predictions of local subchondral bone structural stiffness using neural network-derived density-modulus relationships for proximal tibial subchondral cortical and trabecular bone.
Nazemi SM; Amini M; Kontulainen SA; Milner JS; Holdsworth DW; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Johnston JD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Jan; 41():1-8. PubMed ID: 27842233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accounting for spatial variation of trabecular anisotropy with subject-specific finite element modeling moderately improves predictions of local subchondral bone stiffness at the proximal tibia.
Nazemi SM; Kalajahi SMH; Cooper DML; Kontulainen SA; Holdsworth DW; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Johnston JD
J Biomech; 2017 Jul; 59():101-108. PubMed ID: 28601243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Separate modeling of cortical and trabecular bone offers little improvement in FE predictions of local structural stiffness at the proximal tibia.
Hosseini Kalajahi SM; Nazemi SM; Johnston JD
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Dec; 22(16):1258-1268. PubMed ID: 31509022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individual and combined effects of OA-related subchondral bone alterations on proximal tibial surface stiffness: a parametric finite element modeling study.
Amini M; Nazemi SM; Lanovaz JL; Kontulainen S; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Szyszkowski W; Johnston JD
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Aug; 37(8):783-91. PubMed ID: 26074327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new material mapping procedure for quantitative computed tomography-based, continuum finite element analyses of the vertebra.
Unnikrishnan GU; Morgan EF
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jul; 133(7):071001. PubMed ID: 21823740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The predictive ability of a QCT-FE model of the proximal femoral stiffness under multiple load cases is strongly influenced by experimental uncertainties.
Amini M; Reisinger A; Synek A; Hirtler L; Pahr D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Mar; 139():105664. PubMed ID: 36657193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Density-Dependent Material and Failure Criteria Equations Highly Affect the Accuracy and Precision of QCT/FEA-Based Predictions of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture Properties.
Prado M; Rezaei A; Giambini H
Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Feb; 49(2):663-672. PubMed ID: 32820381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping and Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness.
Giambini H; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nassr A; Yaszemski MJ; Zhao C
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Sep; 138(9):0910031-7. PubMed ID: 27428281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of 3D QCT scan protocol on the QCT-based finite element models of human vertebral cancellous bone.
Lu Y; Engelke K; Püschel K; Morlock MM; Huber G
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Aug; 36(8):1069-73. PubMed ID: 24894031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Heterogeneous material mapping methods for patient-specific finite element models of pelvic trabecular bone: A convergence study.
Babazadeh Naseri A; Dunbar NJ; Baines AJ; Akin JE; Higgs Iii CF; Fregly BJ
Med Eng Phys; 2021 Oct; 96():1-12. PubMed ID: 34565547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mapping anisotropy of the proximal femur for enhanced image based finite element analysis.
Enns-Bray WS; Owoc JS; Nishiyama KK; Boyd SK
J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3272-8. PubMed ID: 25219361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo precision of three HR-pQCT-derived finite element models of the distal radius and tibia in postmenopausal women.
Kawalilak CE; Kontulainen SA; Amini MA; Lanovaz JL; Olszynski WP; Johnston JD
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Sep; 17(1):389. PubMed ID: 27619649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proximal Tibia Bone Stiffness and Strength in HR-pQCT- and QCT-Based Finite Element Models.
Knowles NK; Whittier DE; Besler BA; Boyd SK
Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Sep; 49(9):2389-2398. PubMed ID: 33977411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of fabric on the accuracy of computed tomography-based finite element analyses of the vertebra.
Wu Y; Morgan EF
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Apr; 19(2):505-517. PubMed ID: 31506861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength.
Buckley JM; Loo K; Motherway J
Bone; 2007 Mar; 40(3):767-74. PubMed ID: 17174619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of density-modulus relationships used in finite element modeling of the shoulder.
Knowles NK; Langohr GDG; Faieghi M; Nelson AJ; Ferreira LM
Med Eng Phys; 2019 Apr; 66():40-46. PubMed ID: 30833224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of structural failure of tibial bone models under physiological loads: effect of CT density-modulus relationships.
Tuncer M; Hansen UN; Amis AA
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Aug; 36(8):991-7; discussion 991. PubMed ID: 24907128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
