218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33485602)
1. Complications following titanium cranioplasty compared with nontitanium implants cranioplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu S; Chen Y; Lin F; Chen Z; Jiang X; Zhang J; Wang J
J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Feb; 84():66-74. PubMed ID: 33485602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Titanium Mesh and Custom Implants for Cranioplasty.
Rosinski CL; Patel S; Geever B; Chiu RG; Chaker AN; Zakrzewski J; Rosenberg DM; Parola R; Shah K; Behbahani M; Mehta AI
Neurosurgery; 2020 Jan; 86(1):E15-E22. PubMed ID: 31529096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of complications in cranioplasty with various materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu L; Lu ST; Liu AH; Hou WB; Cao WR; Zhou C; Yin YX; Yuan KS; Liu HJ; Zhang MG; Zhang HJ
Br J Neurosurg; 2020 Aug; 34(4):388-396. PubMed ID: 32233810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.
Cabraja M; Klein M; Lehmann TN
Neurosurg Focus; 2009 Jun; 26(6):E10. PubMed ID: 19485714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of Cranioplasty with Preformed Titanium versus Freehand Molded Polymethylmethacrylate Implants.
Höhne J; Werzmirzowsky K; Ott C; Hohenberger C; Hassanin BG; Brawanski A; Schebesch KM
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2018 May; 79(3):200-205. PubMed ID: 28800664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.
Thien A; King NK; Ang BT; Wang E; Ng I
World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 24909393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes and Complications of Pediatric Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review.
Abu-Ghname A; Banuelos J; Oliver JD; Vyas K; Daniels D; Sharaf B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Sep; 144(3):433e-443e. PubMed ID: 31461029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications and cosmetic outcomes of materials used in cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy-a systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.
Gerstl JVE; Rendon LF; Burke SM; Doucette J; Mekary RA; Smith TR
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Dec; 164(12):3075-3090. PubMed ID: 35593924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Letter to the Editor: Complications following titanium cranioplasty compared with nontitanium implants cranioplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Amoo M; Henry J
J Clin Neurosci; 2021 May; 87():32-34. PubMed ID: 33863530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes following polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Punchak M; Chung LK; Lagman C; Bui TT; Lazareff J; Rezzadeh K; Jarrahy R; Yang I
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 41():30-35. PubMed ID: 28377284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of Immediate Titanium Cranioplasty Following Post-Craniotomy Infection.
Talwar AA; Bhat DK; Heiman AJ; Ricci JA
J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(5):1404-1407. PubMed ID: 32310891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications of Cranioplasty in Relation to Material: Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.
Henry J; Amoo M; Taylor J; O'Brien DP
Neurosurgery; 2021 Aug; 89(3):383-394. PubMed ID: 34100535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of Titanium Mesh Cranioplasty in Pediatric Patients.
Ma IT; Symon MR; Bristol RE; Beals SP; Joganic EF; Adelson PD; Shafron DH; Singh DJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 29049146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate titanium cranioplasty after debridement and craniectomy for postcraniotomy surgical site infection.
Kshettry VR; Hardy S; Weil RJ; Angelov L; Barnett GH
Neurosurgery; 2012 Mar; 70(1 Suppl Operative):8-14; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 22343833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.
Wesp D; Krenzlin H; Jankovic D; Ottenhausen M; Jägersberg M; Ringel F; Keric N
Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3647-3655. PubMed ID: 36222944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complications following cranioplasty and relationship to timing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Malcolm JG; Rindler RS; Chu JK; Grossberg JA; Pradilla G; Ahmad FU
J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 33():39-51. PubMed ID: 27499122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants - A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures.
Vince GH; Kraschl J; Rauter H; Stein M; Grossauer S; Uhl E
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 61():205-209. PubMed ID: 30396817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between the different types of heterologous materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review of the literature.
Morselli C; Zaed I; Tropeano MP; Cataletti G; Iaccarino C; Rossini Z; Servadei F
J Neurosurg Sci; 2019 Dec; 63(6):723-736. PubMed ID: 31599560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-Term Complications of Cranioplasty Using Stored Autologous Bone Graft, Three-Dimensional Polymethyl Methacrylate, or Titanium Mesh After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Single-Center Experience After 596 Procedures.
Yeap MC; Tu PH; Liu ZH; Hsieh PC; Liu YT; Lee CY; Lai HY; Chen CT; Huang YC; Wei KC; Wu CT; Chen CC
World Neurosurg; 2019 Aug; 128():e841-e850. PubMed ID: 31082551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Surgical Outcomes of Cranioplasty Using Titanium, Customized Polymethylmethacrylate, and Liquid Polymethylmethacrylate in Maharaj Nakhon Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand.
Vongsfak J; Vaniyapong T; Norasethada T; Watcharasaksilp W; Jetjumnong C; Srihagulang C; Limpastan K
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 33(5):1521-1524. PubMed ID: 34999614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
