BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33485673)

  • 1. Postoperative intensive care unit stay after minimally invasive esophagectomy shows large hospital variation. Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.
    Voeten DM; van der Werf LR; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Hillegersberg R;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1961-1968. PubMed ID: 33485673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Length of hospital stay after uncomplicated esophagectomy. Hospital variation shows room for nationwide improvement.
    Voeten DM; van der Werf LR; van Sandick JW; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6344-6357. PubMed ID: 33104919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally Invasive Oncologic Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery can be Performed Safely on all Weekdays: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
    Voeten DM; Elfrink AKE; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI
    World J Surg; 2021 Sep; 45(9):2816-2829. PubMed ID: 34032925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of hospital experience in bariatric surgery on short-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a nationwide analysis.
    Janssen HJB; Geraedts TCM; Simkens GA; Visser M; de Hingh IHJT; van Det MJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van Hillegersberg R; Luyer MDP; Nienhuijs SW
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):720-734. PubMed ID: 38040832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence and impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Day RW; Jaroszewski D; Chang YH; Ross HJ; Paripati H; Ashman JB; Rule WG; Harold KL
    Dis Esophagus; 2016 Aug; 29(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 25824527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.
    Seesing MFJ; Gisbertz SS; Goense L; van Hillegersberg R; Kroon HM; Lagarde SM; Ruurda JP; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL
    Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 28796016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management and outcome of cervical versus intrathoracic manifestation of cervical anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer.
    van Rossum PSN; Haverkamp L; Carvello M; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26919029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overall Volume Trends in Esophageal Cancer Surgery Results From the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.
    Voeten DM; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; Wilschut JA; Ferri LE; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
    Ann Surg; 2021 Sep; 274(3):449-458. PubMed ID: 34397452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital Variation in Feeding Jejunostomy Policy for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
    Visser MR; Straatman J; Voeten DM; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; Luyer MDP; van der Sluis PC; van der Peet DL; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Hillegersberg R;
    Nutrients; 2022 Dec; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 36615812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    van Workum F; Verstegen MHP; Klarenbeek BR; Bouwense SAW; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Daams F; Gisbertz SS; Hannink G; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Jansen W; Kouwenhoven EA; van Lanschot JJB; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van der Peet DL; Polat F; Ubels S; Wijnhoven BPL; Rovers MM; Rosman C;
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Jul; 156(7):601-610. PubMed ID: 33978698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
    Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
    Berlth F; Plum PS; Chon SH; Gutschow CA; Bollschweiler E; Hölscher AH
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 29931451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.
    Kauppi J; Räsänen J; Sihvo E; Huuhtanen R; Nelskylä K; Salo J
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2614-9. PubMed ID: 25480610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial).
    van der Sluis PC; Ruurda JP; van der Horst S; Verhage RJ; Besselink MG; Prins MJ; Haverkamp L; Schippers C; Rinkes IH; Joore HC; Ten Kate FJ; Koffijberg H; Kroese CC; van Leeuwen MS; Lolkema MP; Reerink O; Schipper ME; Steenhagen E; Vleggaar FP; Voest EE; Siersema PD; van Hillegersberg R
    Trials; 2012 Nov; 13():230. PubMed ID: 23199187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Adaption of surgical procedure in the treatment of submucosal esophageal cancer].
    Hao S; Li Z; Fang W; Mao T; Zhao H; Zhong C
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 18(9):885-8. PubMed ID: 26404683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.
    Salem AI; Thau MR; Strom TJ; Abbott AM; Saeed N; Almhanna K; Hoffe SE; Shridhar R; Karl RC; Meredith KL
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27149640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and feasible for treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Ma S; Yan T; Liu D; Wang K; Wang J; Song J; Wang T; He W; Bai J; Jin L; Chen X
    Thorac Cancer; 2018 Feb; 9(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 29319236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of Esophagogastric Cancer Surgery During Eight Years of Surgical Auditing by the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA).
    Voeten DM; Busweiler LAD; van der Werf LR; Wijnhoven BPL; Verhoeven RHA; van Sandick JW; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
    Ann Surg; 2021 Nov; 274(5):866-873. PubMed ID: 34334633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Utilizing a Stapled Side-to-Side Anastomosis is Safe in the Western Patient Population.
    Ben-David K; Tuttle R; Kukar M; Rossidis G; Hochwald SN
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):3056-62. PubMed ID: 27112585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.