These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3348568)

  • 21. Comparing data accuracy between structured abstracts and full-text journal articles: implications in their use for informing clinical decisions.
    Fontelo P; Gavino A; Sarmiento RF
    Evid Based Med; 2013 Dec; 18(6):207-11. PubMed ID: 23786759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A proposal for structured abstracts of health economic studies.
    Mittmann N; Trakas K; Iskedjian M; Bradley CA; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 1998 Nov; 32(11):1244-6. PubMed ID: 9825095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation of 'Inpharma', a drug literature abstracting service.
    Milne A
    J Clin Hosp Pharm; 1981 Sep; 6(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 7298861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research.
    Li G; Abbade LPF; Nwosu I; Jin Y; Leenus A; Maaz M; Wang M; Bhatt M; Zielinski L; Sanger N; Bantoto B; Luo C; Shams I; Shahid H; Chang Y; Sun G; Mbuagbaw L; Samaan Z; Levine MAH; Adachi JD; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):181. PubMed ID: 29287585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals.
    Can OS; Yilmaz AA; Hasdogan M; Alkaya F; Turhan SC; Can MF; Alanoglu Z
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):485-92. PubMed ID: 21037480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Conference presentation to publication: a retrospective study evaluating quality of abstracts and journal articles in medical education research.
    Stephenson CR; Vaa BE; Wang AT; Schroeder DR; Beckman TJ; Reed DA; Sawatsky AP
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):193. PubMed ID: 29121891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Abstract quality assessment of articles from the Annales de Dermatologie].
    Khosrotehrani K; Dupuy A; Lebbé C; Rybojad M; Morel P
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2002 Nov; 129(11):1271-5. PubMed ID: 12514515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of abstracts for original research articles in pharmacy journals.
    Ward LG; Kendrach MG; Price SO
    Ann Pharmacother; 2004; 38(7-8):1173-7. PubMed ID: 15150375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Writing an abstract.
    Fain JA
    Diabetes Educ; 1998; 24(3):353-6. PubMed ID: 9677953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality of abstracts describing randomized trials in the proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings: guidelines for improved reporting.
    Krzyzanowska MK; Pintilie M; Brezden-Masley C; Dent R; Tannock IF
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 May; 22(10):1993-9. PubMed ID: 15143092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reporting quality for abstracts of randomized controlled trials in cancer nursing research.
    Guo JW; Iribarren SJ
    Cancer Nurs; 2014; 37(6):436-44. PubMed ID: 24406384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: many informative elements missing.
    Cook DA; Beckman TJ; Bordage G
    Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 41(11):1074-81. PubMed ID: 17973768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reporting quality of trial abstracts-improved yet suboptimal: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chhapola V; Tiwari S; Brar R; Kanwal SK
    J Evid Based Med; 2018 May; 11(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 29460397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. More informative abstracts.
    Altman DG; Gardner MJ
    Ann Intern Med; 1987 Nov; 107(5):790-1. PubMed ID: 3662310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality of abstracts of original research articles in CMAJ in 1989.
    Narine L; Yee DS; Einarson TR; Ilersich AL
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 1993292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. More informative abstracts: current status and evaluation.
    Haynes RB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Jul; 46(7):595-7; discussion 599. PubMed ID: 8326343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Korevaar DA; Cohen JF; Hooft L; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):708-15. PubMed ID: 25703213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine.
    Rubin HR; Redelmeier DA; Wu AW; Steinberg EP
    J Gen Intern Med; 1993 May; 8(5):255-8. PubMed ID: 8505684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Structured abstracts of original research and review articles.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1990 Oct; 143(7):619-22. PubMed ID: 2207917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.
    Taddio A; Pain T; Fassos FF; Boon H; Ilersich AL; Einarson TR
    CMAJ; 1994 May; 150(10):1611-5. PubMed ID: 8174031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.