These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3348858)

  • 1. An assessment of the first decade's experience with antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Schneider EP; Hutson JM; Petrie RH
    Am J Perinatol; 1988 Apr; 5(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 3348858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical utility of the nonstress test in the conservative management of women with preterm spontaneous premature rupture of the membranes.
    Smith CV; Greenspoon J; Phelan JP; Platt LD
    J Reprod Med; 1987 Jan; 32(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 3560057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of fetal heart rate decelerations following acoustic stimulation with perinatal outcome.
    Dunston-Boone G; Kuhlman K; Kaufmann M
    Am J Perinatol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 8540939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of nonstress fetal heart rate testing in multiple gestations.
    Blake GD; Knuppel RA; Ingardia CJ; Lake M; Aumann G; Hanson M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Apr; 63(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 6700901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antepartum nonstress test and the postmature pregnancy.
    Fleischer A; Schulman H; Farmakides G; Perrotta LA; McGovern G; Katz N
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jul; 66(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 4011074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved outcome of twice weekly nonstress testing.
    Boehm FH; Salyer S; Shah DM; Vaughn WK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):566-8. PubMed ID: 3960430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK; Dorchester W
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 8041536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal death following antepartum fetal heart rate testing: a review of 65 cases.
    Smith CV; Nguyen HN; Kovacs B; McCart D; Phelan JP; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 3601265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal biophysical profile and perinatal death.
    Baskett TF; Allen AC; Gray JH; Young DC; Young LM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 70(3 Pt 1):357-60. PubMed ID: 3306498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does centralized monitoring affect perinatal outcome?
    Weiss PM; Balducci J; Reed J; Klasko SK; Rust OA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1997; 6(6):317-9. PubMed ID: 9438212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive value of the nonreactive nonstress test in evaluating neonatal outcome.
    Bhide A; Bhattacharya MS
    J Postgrad Med; 1990 Apr; 36(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 2097363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Continuing role of the nonstress test in the management of postdates pregnancy.
    Phelan JP; Platt LD; Yeh SY; Trujillo M; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Nov; 64(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 6493655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies.
    Platt LD; Walla CA; Paul RH; Trujillo ME; Loesser CV; Jacobs ND; Broussard PM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 4061530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonstress and contraction stress fetal heart rate monitoring. A randomized trial to determine which is the faster primary test.
    Newnham JP; Burns SE; Szczygielski C; Roberman B
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 3367336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contraction stress test for antepartum fetal evaluation.
    Schifrin BS; Lapidus M; Doctor GS; Leviton A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Apr; 45(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 1121373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Rutherford SE; Phelan JP; Smith CV; Jacobs N
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 70(3 Pt 1):353-6. PubMed ID: 3306497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Continuing experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Nguyen HN; Jacobs N; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 3367338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.