These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33491400)

  • 1. Randomized Controlled Trial of Class II ART High-viscosity Glass-ionomer Cement and Conventional Resin-composite restorations in Permanent Dentition: Two-year Survival.
    Molina GF; Ulloque MJ; Mazzola I; Mulder J; Frencken J
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(6):555-565. PubMed ID: 33491400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective and randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of ART restorations with high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement versus conventional restorations with resin composite in Class II cavities of permanent teeth: two-year follow-up.
    Menezes-Silva R; Velasco SRM; BRESCIANi E; Bastos RDS; Navarro MFL
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2021; 29():e20200609. PubMed ID: 33656064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized clinical trial of class II restoration in permanent teeth comparing ART with composite resin after 12 months.
    Menezes-Silva R; Velasco SRM; Bastos RS; Molina G; Honório HM; Frencken JE; Navarro MFL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Sep; 23(9):3623-3635. PubMed ID: 30612246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Five-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorative systems in small class II restorations.
    Wafaie RA; Ibrahim Ali A; El-Negoly SAE; Mahmoud SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Apr; 35(3):538-555. PubMed ID: 36564970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.
    Olegário IC; Hesse D; Bönecker M; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
    BMC Oral Health; 2016 Aug; 17(1):34. PubMed ID: 27485432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-viscosity glass-ionomer vs. composite resin restorations in persons with disability: Five-year follow-up of clinical trial.
    Molina GF; Faulks D; Mulder J; Frencken JE
    Braz Oral Res; 2019; 33():e099. PubMed ID: 31778471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-viscosity glass-ionomer cements for direct posterior tooth restorations in permanent teeth: The evidence in brief.
    Mickenautsch S
    J Dent; 2016 Dec; 55():121-123. PubMed ID: 27765512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ART with high viscosity GIC and composite restorations in class II cavities: can they thrive in the post-amalgam era?
    Gugnani N; Gugnani S
    Evid Based Dent; 2020 Mar; 21(1):22-23. PubMed ID: 32221490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is high-viscosity glass-ionomer-cement a successor to amalgam for treating primary molars?
    Hilgert LA; de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE
    Dent Mater; 2014 Oct; 30(10):1172-8. PubMed ID: 25132283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.
    Ersin NK; Candan U; Aykut A; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Nov; 137(11):1529-36. PubMed ID: 17082278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-year survival of ART high-viscosity glass-ionomer and resin composite restorations in people with disability.
    Molina GF; Faulks D; Mazzola I; Cabral RJ; Mulder J; Frencken JE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jan; 22(1):461-467. PubMed ID: 28547182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement or composite resin for restorations in posterior permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analyses.
    Cribari L; Madeira L; Roeder RBR; Macedo RM; Wambier LM; Porto TS; Gonzaga CC; Kaizer MR
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104629. PubMed ID: 37499738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro wear of (resin-coated) high-viscosity glass ionomer cements and glass hybrid restorative systems.
    Kielbassa AM; Oehme EP; Shakavets N; Wolgin M
    J Dent; 2021 Feb; 105():103554. PubMed ID: 33309807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized Clinical Trial of ART Class II Restorations Using Two Glass Ionomer Cements: One-Year Follow-Up.
    de França Lopes CMC; Schubert EW; Martins AS; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Chibinski ACR; Wambier DS
    Pediatr Dent; 2018 Mar; 40(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 29663908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of ART and conventional techniques on clinical performance of glass-ionomer cement restorations in load bearing areas of permanent and primary dentitions: A systematic review.
    Ruengrungsom C; Palamara JEA; Burrow MF
    J Dent; 2018 Nov; 78():1-21. PubMed ID: 30017937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 10 year comparison of glass ionomer and composite resin restoration materials in class 1 and 2 cavities.
    Hutchison C; Cave V
    Evid Based Dent; 2019 Dec; 20(4):113-114. PubMed ID: 31863046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized controlled evaluation of posterior resin restorations of an altered resin modified glass-ionomer cement with claimed bioactivity.
    van Dijken JWV; Pallesen U; Benetti A
    Dent Mater; 2019 Feb; 35(2):335-343. PubMed ID: 30527586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival of multiple-surface ART restorations using a zinc-reinforced glass-ionomer restorative after 2 years: A randomized triple-blind clinical trial.
    Mobarak E; El-Deeb H; Daifalla LE; Ghaly M; Mustafa M; Sabry D; Fatah H; Mulder J; Creugers NHJ; Frencken JE
    Dent Mater; 2019 Sep; 35(9):e185-e192. PubMed ID: 31235189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.