These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33491404)

  • 1. Effective Protocol for Daily High-quality Direct Posterior Composite Restorations: Layering and Finishing.
    Peumans M; Politano G; Bazos P; Severino D; Van Meerbeek B
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(6):597-613. PubMed ID: 33491404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
    Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations.
    Morgan M
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 16(3):211-7; quiz 218. PubMed ID: 15199696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 133(10):1387-98. PubMed ID: 12403542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finishing and polishing criteria for minimally invasive composite restorations.
    LeSage B
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):422-8; quiz 429-30. PubMed ID: 22313913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Class II restorations with margins below the CEJ.
    Kanca J; Greitzer G
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 19508264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An integration of composite resin with natural tooth structure: the Class IV restoration.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 16(3):235-42; quiz 244. PubMed ID: 15199699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Iatrogenic tooth abrasion comparisons among composite materials and finishing techniques.
    Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 12426504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth-coloured restoratives. Part 2: composite and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Yap AU; Wong ML; Lim AC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Mar; 27(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 10784332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The scalpel finishing technique: a tooth-friendly way to finish dental composites in anterior teeth.
    Kup E; Tirlet G; Attal JP
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2015; 10(2):228-45. PubMed ID: 25874271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative technique for class V resin composite restorations with minimum finishing/polishing procedures.
    Perez CR
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 20533640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shading concepts and layering techniques to master direct anterior composite restorations: an update.
    Dietschi D; Fahl N
    Br Dent J; 2016 Dec; 221(12):765-771. PubMed ID: 27981983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations.
    Venturini D; Cenci MS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 16536188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.