These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33491929)
21. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks. Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique. Mously HA; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R; Hirayama H J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 24795263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Marginal Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns Fabricated Using Conventional and Digital Methodology: A Three-Dimensional Analysis. Mostafa NZ; Ruse ND; Ford NL; Carvalho RM; Wyatt CCL J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):145-152. PubMed ID: 28833920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Comparative Study of the Accuracy of Dental CAD Programs in Designing a Fixed Partial Denture. Lee YS; Kim SY; Oh KC; Moon HS J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(3):215-220. PubMed ID: 34310790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Marginal and internal discrepancies of zirconia copings: effects of milling system and finish line design. Ribeiro IL; Campos F; Sousa RS; Alves ML; Rodrigues DM; Souza RO; Bottino MA Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 25961609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing titanium and zirconium dioxide bars. Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Yates DM; Izutani N; Enkling N; Blatz MB Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):945-53. PubMed ID: 23890960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The accuracy of a high-precision digitizer for CAD/CAM of crowns. Persson M; Andersson M; Bergman B J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Sep; 74(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 7473274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analysis of Marginal Adaptation of Porcelain Laminate Veneers Produced by Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacturing Technology: A Preliminary In Vitro Study. Pereira DD; Marquezan M; Grossi ML; Silva Oshima HM Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(4):346-348. PubMed ID: 29953565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cement Thickness of Inlay Restorations Made of Lithium Disilicate, Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic and Nano-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Evaluated Using 3D X-Ray Micro-Computed Tomography. Uzgur R; Ercan E; Uzgur Z; Çolak H; Yalçın M; Özcan M J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):456-460. PubMed ID: 27517616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Marginal Fit Evaluation of CAD/CAM All Ceramic Crowns Obtained by Two Digital Workflows: An In Vitro Study Using Micro-CT Technology. Duqum IS; Brenes C; Mendonca G; Carneiro TAPN; Cooper LF J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1037-1043. PubMed ID: 31621973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks. Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures. Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings. Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç HI; Albayrak H J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27622786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of Intra-Oral Scanner (I.O.S.) on The Marginal Accuracy of CAD/CAM Single Crowns. Ferrini F; Sannino G; Chiola C; Capparé P; Gastaldi G; Gherlone EF Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Feb; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 30769768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Trueness of milled prostheses according to number of ball-end mill burs. Kim CM; Kim SR; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 26774318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of the Trueness of Lithium Disilicate Crowns Fabricated From All-in-One and Combination CAD/CAM Systems. Lee JJ; Son K; Bae EB; Choi JW; Lee KB; Huh JB Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(4):352-354. PubMed ID: 31283813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique. Lima FF; Neto CF; Rubo JH; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns. Kale E; Yilmaz B; Seker E; Özcelik TB J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Marginal fit of 14-unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers. Beuer F; Neumeier P; Naumann M J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 36(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 18976261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]