147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33492082)
1. Impact of a Long Linear Staplers on the Incidence of Stricture after Triangulating Esophagogastric Anastomosis.
Toyota S; Kimura Y; Jogo T; Hu Q; Hokonohara K; Nakanishi R; Hisamatsu Y; Ando K; Oki E; Mori M
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2021 Jan; 31(4):453-456. PubMed ID: 33492082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.
Hosoi T; Abe T; Uemura N; Higaki E; Kawai R; Kawakami J; An B; Nagino M; Shimizu Y
World J Surg; 2019 Jul; 43(7):1746-1755. PubMed ID: 30847524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Circular Stapler Method for Avoiding Stricture of Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis.
Shiraishi O; Yasuda T; Kato H; Momose K; Hiraki Y; Yasuda A; Shinkai M; Imano M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 Apr; 26(4):725-732. PubMed ID: 35138510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Nakata K; Nagai E; Ohuchida K; Nakamura K; Tanaka M
World J Surg; 2015 May; 39(5):1099-104. PubMed ID: 25582767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk Factors of Anastomosis Stricture After Esophagectomy and the Impact of Anastomosis Technique.
Na B; Kang CH; Na KJ; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 May; 115(5):1257-1264. PubMed ID: 36739069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Circular stapling versus triangulating stapling for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Hayata K; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Ojima T; Iwahashi M; Katsuda M; Tsuji T; Kato T; Kitadani J; Takeuchi A; Tabata H; Yamaue H
Surgery; 2017 Jul; 162(1):131-138. PubMed ID: 28318550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Modified application of circular stapler to cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Yan M; Chen YH; Liu XB; Shao LF; Li Y
Ai Zheng; 2009 Jul; 28(7):768-70. PubMed ID: 19624907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Totally Mechanical Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Stricture Formation Compared with Circular Stapled Anastomosis.
Hirano Y; Fujita T; Sato K; Kurita D; Sato T; Ishiyama K; Fujiwara H; Oguma J; Daiko H
World J Surg; 2020 Dec; 44(12):4175-4183. PubMed ID: 32783124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study.
Vanstraelen S; Coosemans W; Depypere L; Mandeville Y; Moons J; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 36222069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel technique for cervical gastro-oesophageal anastomosis during minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
Wang ZQ; Jiang YQ; Xu W; Cai HR; Zhang Z; Yin Z; Zhang Q
Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():221-229. PubMed ID: 29609046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
