These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33492156)

  • 1. Paranoia is associated with impaired novelty detection and overconfidence in recognition memory judgments.
    Koller WN; Cannon TD
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2021 Apr; 130(3):273-285. PubMed ID: 33492156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduced benefit of novelty detection on subsequent memory judgments in paranoia.
    Koller WN; Cannon TD
    J Psychopathol Clin Sci; 2023 Aug; 132(6):761-767. PubMed ID: 37307314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Knowledge corruption for visual perception in individuals high on paranoia.
    Moritz S; Göritz AS; Van Quaquebeke N; Andreou C; Jungclaussen D; Peters MJ
    Psychiatry Res; 2014 Mar; 215(3):700-5. PubMed ID: 24461685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is there a G factor for metacognition? Correlations in retrospective metacognitive sensitivity across tasks.
    Mazancieux A; Fleming SM; Souchay C; Moulin CJA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Sep; 149(9):1788-1799. PubMed ID: 32191079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Beliefs about Paranoia Scale: Confirmatory factor analysis and tests of a metacognitive model of paranoia in a clinical sample.
    Murphy EK; Tully S; Pyle M; Gumley AI; Kingdon D; Schwannauer M; Turkington D; Morrison AP
    Psychiatry Res; 2017 Feb; 248():87-94. PubMed ID: 28033512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hunting down the source: How amnesic patients avoid fluency-based memory errors.
    Geurten M; Bastin C; Salmon E; Willems S
    Neuropsychology; 2020 Jan; 34(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 31219296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Paranoia, self-deception and overconfidence.
    Rossi-Goldthorpe RA; Leong YC; Leptourgos P; Corlett PR
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Oct; 17(10):e1009453. PubMed ID: 34618805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Interaction Between Memory Trace and Memory Judgment in Age-Related Decline.
    Guillaume F; Tison C; Marzouki Y
    Exp Aging Res; 2015; 41(5):510-33. PubMed ID: 26524234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of Metacognitive Confidence Judgments in Curiosity: Different Effects of Confidence on Curiosity Across Epistemic and Perceptual Domains.
    Sakaki M; Ten A; Stone H; Murayama K
    Cogn Sci; 2024 Jun; 48(6):e13474. PubMed ID: 38923077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Another look at the contribution of motoric fluency to metacognitive monitoring.
    Dollois MA; Poore-Buchhaupt CJ; Fiacconi CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Dec; 76(4):251-269. PubMed ID: 35482620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aging and forgetting: Forgotten information is perceived as less important than is remembered information.
    Witherby AE; Tauber SK; Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Mar; 34(2):228-241. PubMed ID: 30550310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unity and diversity of metacognition.
    Lehmann M; Hagen J; Ettinger U
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Oct; 151(10):2396-2417. PubMed ID: 35389740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of cognitive and metacognitive factors in non-clinical paranoia and negative affect.
    Sellers R; Emsley R; Wells A; Morrison AP
    Psychol Psychother; 2018 Jun; 91(2):169-185. PubMed ID: 28980765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are the contributions of processing experience and prior beliefs to confidence ratings domain-general or domain-specific?
    Hu X; Yang C; Luo L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):28-44. PubMed ID: 35708950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Negative cognition, affect, metacognition and dimensions of paranoia in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis: a multi-level modelling analysis.
    Morrison AP; Shryane N; Fowler D; Birchwood M; Gumley AI; Taylor HE; French P; Stewart SL; Jones PB; Lewis SW; Bentall RP
    Psychol Med; 2015; 45(12):2675-84. PubMed ID: 26165380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Insight across mental disorders: A multifaceted metacognitive phenomenon.
    Konstantakopoulos G
    Psychiatriki; 2019; 30(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 31115349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian inference model for metamemory.
    Hu X; Zheng J; Su N; Fan T; Yang C; Yin Y; Fleming SM; Luo L
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Oct; 128(5):824-855. PubMed ID: 34043396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks.
    Siedlecka M; Skóra Z; Paulewicz B; Fijałkowska S; Timmermans B; Wierzchoń M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):712-723. PubMed ID: 29999396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aging and recognition memory: A meta-analysis.
    Fraundorf SH; Hourihan KL; Peters RA; Benjamin AS
    Psychol Bull; 2019 Apr; 145(4):339-371. PubMed ID: 30640498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eye spy a liar: assessing the utility of eye fixations and confidence judgments for detecting concealed recognition of faces, scenes and objects.
    Millen AE; Hope L; Hillstrom AP
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):38. PubMed ID: 32797306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.