BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33493399)

  • 1. The Perception of Regional Dialects and Foreign Accents by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):683-690. PubMed ID: 33493399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-Variability Sentence Recognition in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users: Associations With Rapid Phonological Coding and Executive Functioning.
    Smith GNL; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1149-1161. PubMed ID: 30601227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.
    Ji C; Galvin JJ; Chang YP; Xu A; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):532-54. PubMed ID: 24686901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
    Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR; Dhar S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?
    Moberly AC; Mattingly JK; Castellanos I
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(3):127-138. PubMed ID: 31266013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accent Intelligibility Differences in Noise Across Native and Nonnative Accents: Effects of Talker-Listener Pairing at Acoustic-Phonetic and Lexical Levels.
    Stringer L; Iverson P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jul; 62(7):2213-2226. PubMed ID: 31251681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shhh… I Need Quiet! Children's Understanding of American, British, and Japanese-accented English Speakers.
    Bent T; Holt RF
    Lang Speech; 2018 Dec; 61(4):657-673. PubMed ID: 29402164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing Higher Order Language Processing in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users.
    Kronenberger WG; Pisoni DB
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 Nov; 28(4):1537-1553. PubMed ID: 31618055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vowel intelligibility in children with cochlear implants: An acoustic and articulatory study.
    Turgeon C; Trudeau-Fisette P; Fitzpatrick E; Ménard L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():87-96. PubMed ID: 28964317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Use of Prosodic Cues in Sentence Processing by Prelingually Deaf Users of Cochlear Implants.
    Holt CM; Demuth K; Yuen I
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e256-62. PubMed ID: 26656191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prelingually Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants Show Better Perception of Voice Cues and Speech in Competing Speech Than Postlingually Deaf Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Nagels L; Gaudrain E; Vickers D; Hendriks P; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):952-968. PubMed ID: 38616318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More Than Words: the Relative Roles of Prosody and Semantics in the Perception of Emotions in Spoken Language by Postlingual Cochlear Implant Users.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Icht M; Ben-David BM
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1378-1389. PubMed ID: 35030551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of semantic context on the perception of Spanish-accented American English.
    Behrman A; Akhund A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1567-78. PubMed ID: 23882007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of High-variability Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Faulkner KF; Pisoni D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37748726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intelligibility of the Patient's Speech Predicts the Likelihood of Cochlear Implant Success in Prelingually Deaf Adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e302-10. PubMed ID: 26928004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.