857 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33493680)
1. Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Droeghaag R; Hermans SMM; Caelers IJMH; Evers SMAA; van Hemert WLW; van Santbrink H
Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):945-954. PubMed ID: 33493680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of (Partial) economic evaluations of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in adults with lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review.
Caelers IJMH; de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Hemert WLW; de Bie RA; Evers SMAA; van Santbrink H
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245963. PubMed ID: 33571291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.
Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
Eur Spine J; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1780-4. PubMed ID: 20411281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How High Are Radiation-related Risks in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Traditional Open Surgery?: A Meta-analysis and Dose Estimates of Ionizing Radiation.
Kim CH; Lee CH; Kim KP
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 29(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 26889987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Open versus minimally invasive TLIF: literature review and meta-analysis.
Hammad A; Wirries A; Ardeshiri A; Nikiforov O; Geiger F
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Jul; 14(1):229. PubMed ID: 31331364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the clinical outcome in overweight or obese patients after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Wang J; Zhou Y; Feng Zhang Z; Qing Li C; Jie Zheng W; Liu J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jun; 27(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 22614266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Bydon M; Macki M; Abt NB; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Sciubba DM
Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 25463402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.
Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
Eur Spine J; 2011 Apr; 20(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 20927557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 26895529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Davis BJ; Aaronson O; Devin C; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Aug; 15(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 21529203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Comparing Open and Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Surgery.
Eseonu K; Oduoza U; Monem M; Tahir M
Int J Spine Surg; 2022 Jul; 16(4):612-24. PubMed ID: 35835570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of circumferential fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: propensity-matched comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with anterior-posterior fusion.
Jazini E; Gum JL; Glassman SD; Crawford CH; Djurasovic M; Owens RK; Dimar JR; McGraw KE; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1969-1973. PubMed ID: 29705337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally Invasive Versus Traditional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Qin R; Liu B; Zhou P; Yao Y; Hao J; Yang K; Xu TL; Zhang F; Chen X
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():180-189. PubMed ID: 30414524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Open Transforaminal and Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions Using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio at 2-Year Follow-up.
Gandhoke GS; Shin HM; Chang YF; Tempel Z; Gerszten PC; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
Neurosurgery; 2016 Apr; 78(4):585-95. PubMed ID: 26726969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-Utility Analysis of Instrumented Fusion Versus Decompression Alone for Grade I L4-L5 Spondylolisthesis at 1-Year Follow-up: A Pilot Study.
Alvin MD; Lubelski D; Abdullah KG; Whitmore RG; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 29(2):E80-6. PubMed ID: 26889996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Levin JM; Tanenbaum JE; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Overley SC
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1088-1098. PubMed ID: 29452283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Wang MY; Park P; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurgery; 2020 Sep; 87(3):555-562. PubMed ID: 32409828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
